A LONDON journalist has been told to "calm down" after making a series of bizarre indyref2 claims.
Dan Hodges, who works for the Mail on Sunday, said police will close down polling stations during another independence referendum, as they tried to do in Catalonia.
He tweeted: "Do people actually realise what we're heading for in Scotland. We're literally going to see the police closing down polling stations. When people say the UK Government should go to court to block a referendum this is where it will end up. At which point independence is nailed on."
Do people actually realise what we're heading for in Scotland. We're literally going to see the police closing down polling stations. When people say the UK Government should go to court to block a referendum this is where it will end up. At which point independence is nailed on.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) May 8, 2021
Police Scotland is held to account by the Scottish Police Authority which is accountable to Scottish Ministers and the Scottish Parliament.
Alex Massie, the Scotland editor of the Spectator, said "mate, calm down" in response.
Hodges replied: "But I don't get it. Why do people who claim to want to protect the Union, and despise Sturgeon and her nationalism, literally keep doing everything Sturgeon wants them to do."
But I don't get it. Why do people who claim to want to protect the Union, and despise Sturgeon and her nationalism, literally keep doing everything Sturgeon wants them to do.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) May 8, 2021
Nicola Sturgeon has always ruled out a "wildcat" referendum on independence if the SNP wins a majority at the Holyrood election.
“I would not countenance an illegal referendum – not least because it would not deliver independence,” Sturgeon said during the BBC leaders' debate.
She added: “I will be responsible about that and I will build, and ultimately I think win, the case for independence through patient persuasion of people across the country.”
READ MORE: Peter Murrell hits out at BBC's coverage of Holyrood election results
People from across the political spectrum criticised Hodges' tweet.
Journalist Caroline Mortimer said: "But surely only if Sturgeon unilaterally goes for a referendum which she probably won’t...and policing is devolved anyway..."
Labour councillor Stephen McCabe said: "Elections and referenda in Scotland are run by local returning officers who are the Chief Executives of Scotland's 32 Councils. They will act within the law at all times and seek independent legal advice if that is required. Police Scotland will also act within the law."
Journalist David Leask said: "There is a business opportunity in offering 'Scotland 101' courses for London commentators at some nice Highland hotel. Anonymity guaranteed. How much should we charge?"
Tory councillor Braden Davy said: "As a local councillor in Angus, I am 100% sure returning officers would REFUSE to engage with an illegal referendum. And if not, I am sure pro-union local authorities would instruct their chief executives not to engage with such a vote."
Here are the best responses:
1.
Sturgeon: “I would not countenance an illegal referendum – not least because it would not deliver independence”
— Paul Anderson (@Panderson2588) May 8, 2021
Pro-Union folks: la la la 🙉🙉 la la la https://t.co/Yn219F2t6B
2.
This is nonsense. SNP cannot illegally spend funds and use resources on an illegal referendum. Civil service etc. cannot engage, so it wouldn't get this far. https://t.co/DzZaiO9uUX
— ofjmx (@ofjmx) May 8, 2021
3.
Surely not? A judgment that it is illegal would stop civil servants physically implementing it. Even if they did, the boycott by unionists and court judgment would seal its illegitimacy. https://t.co/5hhQ4FRheC
— Tom Hatton (@tomhatton1) May 8, 2021
4.
This is not where it will end up. If a referendum Bill is held to be outwith competence, there will be no referendum. https://t.co/U2OA9dGApR
— Aileen McHarg (@AileenMcHarg) May 8, 2021
5.
No it isn't. Catalonia was prevented from holding an illegal referendum and today Catalonia is still part of Spain. https://t.co/Kk4zdCJmcz
— Daniel Gannon (@instadangan) May 8, 2021
6.
I think this is a tad hysterical.. https://t.co/x6jFtsoreg
— JimmyA (@Razedabode12) May 8, 2021
7.
Settle down Dan https://t.co/Ipqqt6XAoU
— Steven H. Seggie (@Seggitorial) May 8, 2021
8.
English Nationalism rears its ugly undemocratic head in Scotland #indyref2 https://t.co/ZnbwaA8oR7
— 🍒Jeannie McCrimmon (@IndyLassie) May 8, 2021
9.
Police Scotland are run by Scotgov. Seems an odd thing for them to do. https://t.co/LPeLkmt6nZ
— Mr D 🦓 (@JugglingJelly) May 8, 2021
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel