A YOUNG independence supporter has accused the BBC of exhibiting “blatant bias” against the Yes movement after being interviewed for Radio 4.
Kelly Given, 24, featured in a report on the Today programme by journalist James Naughtie about younger voters in Scotland. But after it was aired, she condemned the BBC for suggesting SNP voters have been “brainwashed”.
READ MORE: Kelly Given: The BBC painted me as an 'SNP evangelical' for disliking Unionism's status quo
Naughtie, who spoke to several people on “both sides of the divide”, began his report by pointing out young Scots are far more likely to back independence than older ones. Introducing Given, he claimed she offered an “evangelical pitch” for Yes – despite the activist expressly rejecting that description in the interview.
Detailing her support for the SNP, she told the BBC journalist: “I was totally disengaged from politics – I was actually going to vote No. Then my mum took me to an event where Nicola Sturgeon was speaking … and something shifted in my brain that night.”
“It sounds like almost a religious conversion,” Naughtie replied.
The suggestion was laughed off and rejected by Given, who said: “Absolutely not.”
The BBC Radio 4 reporter also emphasised the words “belief” and “mission” as he framed support for the SNP as an almost religious pursuit.
Picking up on Given’s use of the word “mission”, Naughtie commented: “This is why the SNP’s opponents were so frustrated in this election campaign when debates about schools, roads or drugs were all wrapped up in ‘the mission’.”
Listen to the BBC Radio 4 report on young Scottish voters here
Given, who had travelled from Edinburgh to Glasgow for the interview in George Square, was appalled by the report when she heard it broadcast.
She posted on social media: “Disappointed that every critical, thoughtful point I made was cut out and edited so you could inaccurately describe me as ‘evangelical’.
“Attempting to portray young people as brainwashed and incapable of independent thought is patronizing and tbh poor reporting.”
She added: “This kind of unapologetic and blatant bias in reporting helps nobody.”
You wouldn’t know, but we spoke thoughtfully about policy in an Indy Scotland and why younger generations are so progressive and politically engaged.
— Kelly Given (@kellylgiven) May 10, 2021
This kind of unapologetic and blatant bias in reporting helps nobody. pic.twitter.com/S8xu0J8WJU
As of 3pm James Naughtie had not replied to the complaint.
Speaking to The National, Given said her treatment was symptomatic of wider failings at the BBC.
“It was awful,” she said, explaining that a 25-minute discussion about the nuances of independence was cut down to a few soundbites.
“We had 25 minutes of quite thoughtful discussion about policy in an independent Scotland, about why young people are so progressive and politically engaged, about our reasons for supporting independence.”
But Given added: “They’ve made it out as if I’ve just said ‘this one time I was brainwashed by Nicola Sturgeon’. But the question was actually what was your first political event.”
Given with young Yes activists on a campaign trip
“I knew at the time the questions were very hostile. We know it was going to be bad but [the broadcast report] was just awful.”
The SNP activist summed up her impression of the BBC. “Their overall attitude towards independence is very hostile and we all know that,” she said. “The general reporting on indyref is tainted with bias.”
Given continued: “This is a much wider issue in terms of young people because even throughout the interview, the questions they were asking were very much insinuating that we had been indoctrinated, that we had been influenced by older people to be part of the SNP instead of being human beings with independent thought.”
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel