A CAMPAIGNER who took part in a mass protest against the detention of two men in Glasgow has said its success sends a message that the Home Office “shouldn’t act like the mafia”.
Police Scotland released two Indian nationals detained by Border Force officials in Kenmure Street, Pollokshields, after people surrounded the van they were being held in and prevented it from leaving on Thursday.
Demonstrators blocked the immigration enforcement van for several hours, with one even lying underneath the vehicle.
Mohammad Asif said: “People are fed up with a climate of fear ... it was the people’s revolution, led by the people – ordinary people of Glasgow in Pollokshields.”
Asif, 54, director of the Afghan Human Rights Foundation, joined the protest from 10am until the men’s release shortly after 5pm.
Asked what message the protest’s success sends, Asif said: “The Home Office shouldn’t act like the mafia, they should have a more humane way of removing people.
“We don’t say every person should come to the UK and live here, but we’ve been watching these dawn raids – myself for the past 20 years.
“The Home Office does it in a very brutal way ... it’s like you’ve committed murder or rape – there are different ways to remove people without taking them from their bed.”
Asif, who left Afghanistan as a refugee in 2000, said he visited the two men’s families during the protest.
“I spoke to the father and the old man was crying ... their family members were all crying, shaking and shivering,” he said.
Asif also condemned the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill – proposed legislation which will hand greater powers to police to shut down protests deemed overly noisy or disruptive.
Although the bill only applies to England and Wales, Asif said protests like the one in Glasgow would not be able to occur and campaigners outside of Scotland need to “stand up” to halt the legislation.
“My appeal to ... my colleagues in England and other parts of the UK, they should stand up,” he said.
“If they let it go, the next time protests will be banned – if we allowed it, this would be a failure on our part.”
Asif is Muslim and although Thursday marked the Islamic festival of Eid al-Fitr, which he would normally have spent with family, he and fellow protesters said they were prepared to stay at the scene.
It is understood neither of the men who were in the van are Muslim, but the Border Force action was widely criticised for taking place on Eid al-Fitr.
Asif said: “We were there to stay as long as it took. I didn’t even see my family. Although it was a very special day for us ... we missed that [Eid] – and we missed it for a reason. We stood against injustice.”
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the Home Office needs to ask “itself hard questions” after the protests.
She tweeted: “Doing this on Eid, in the heart of our Muslim community, and in the midst of a serious Covid outbreak was staggeringly irresponsible – but the even deeper problem is an appalling asylum & immigration policy.”
A Home Office spokesperson said on Thursday: “The UK Government is tackling illegal immigration and the harm it causes, often to the most vulnerable people, by removing those with no right to be in the UK.
“The operation in Glasgow was conducted in relation to suspected immigration offences and the two Indian nationals complied with officers at all times.
“The UK Government continues to tackle illegal migration in all its forms and our New Plan for Immigration will speed up the removal of those who have entered the UK illegally.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here