BEFORE taking their seats all newly elected MSPs must take the oath or, for non deists the affirmation, of allegiance to the Queen “I (name) do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, Her Heirs and Successors, according to Law. So help me God.”
At Thursday’s oath taking session in Holyrood many of the newly elected MSPs proudly proclaimed that their first loyalty is to the Sovereign People of Scotland not to the Queen. Indeed the First Minister herself prefaced her oath taking by stating that the SNP "pledges loyalty to the people of Scotland in line with the Scottish constitutional tradition of the sovereignty of the people".
These assertions of the sovereignty of the Scots People were a powerful symbol by MSPs but it was a transitory one. I would like to propose a means by which the Scottish Parliament can publicly and permanently assert that sovereignty by a means that would cost nothing and which is entirely within the control of Holyrood: preface all Acts of the Scottish Parliament with an assertion of that sovereignty by means of an appropriately worded “enactment formula.” An enactment formula is a "poetic flourish" at the beginning of statute saying who has "enacted" or made the Act and which also, ideally, represents the political and legal position of that legislature.
WATCH: Nicola Sturgeon sworn in as MSP at start of new Holyrood term
Scotland is unusual in that its statutes carry no such words of enactment. The Westminster Parliament, the assemblies of Northern Ireland and Wales, and indeed most other legislatures around the world use some form of enactment clause at the beginning of their Acts, and so it is a strange anomaly that the Scottish Parliament does not. Such a formula would literally nothing but would make a strong statement about Scotland and its Parliament.
All Westminster statutes are prefaced with the words: "BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's [King's] most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—"
Obviously this feudal formulation would be entirely inappropriate for Holyrood statutes but a wording which puts the emphasis firmly on the people not the monarch can easily be drafted. This can be seen in the following other enactment formulae:
Northern Ireland Assembly: "BE IT ENACTED by being passed by the Northern Ireland Assembly and assented to by Her [His] Majesty as follows."
National Assembly for Wales: "Having been passed by the National Assembly for Wales and having received the assent of Her Majesty, it is enacted as follows.”
New York Legislature: “The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows.”
READ MORE: Senior law lecturer breaks down Adam Tomkins's plan to curb Scottish democracy
My suggestion is that all Scottish Acts of Parliament should be preceded by an enactment clause which proclaims the sovereignty of the people in the following words:
The Sovereign People of Scotland, as represented by their elected Members in the Scottish Parliament presently assembled in Edinburgh, and with the assent of the Queen’s most Gracious Majesty, does hereby enact, statute and ordain as law: -
The reason I propose that particular wording is that it takes the union enactment clauses of the pre Union Scots Parliaments such as “Our Soveraigne Lord and Lady The King and Queens Majesties….Doe with advice and consent of the Estates of Parliament Statute and Ordaine..” and turns it on its head by stressing that but today it is the Scots People that are sovereign, not the monarch. The Royal Assent which is purely nominal is placed at the end of the formula unlike the Westminster formula which begins with the monarch.
This new enactment formula could be adopted by a simple resolution of the Scottish Parliament and would send a strong message that the people of Scotland are sovereign.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel