THE UK Government is split over whether it will grant tariff-free access to farmers in the post-Brexit trade deal with Australia, according to reports.
The Department for Agriculture and the Department for International Trade are locked in an internal battle over the trade deal – which would likely cause backlash among the farming industry in the UK.
It is understood that zero-tariff imports of Australian lamb and beef will hit rural Scottish and Welsh hill farms hardest.
READ MORE: Tory government's Internal Market Act is ‘deadly’ for Scots farming
The UK Government estimates a free trade deal with Australia would be worth about 0.01% of GDP over the next 15 years.
One insider opposed to the deal told the Financial Times the UK would be “signing off the slow death of British farming so Liz Truss can score a quick political point”.
The International Trade Secretary believes the UK’s deal with Australia should be on a similar “zero traffic, zero quota” basis as the deal with the EU.
Upon hearing about the row last night, Scotland’s deputy first minister John Swinney took to Twitter to attack the plans.
“This proposed deal is a huge threat to Scottish agriculture,” he said. “It will devastate the hill farming communities I represent and no self-respecting U.K. Government could sign this.”
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford added: “This would be devastating for farming and crofting. I shudder to think of the impact on crofting communities”.
The president of the National Farmers’ Union has been among those criticising the UK Government’s approach to the deal.
Minette Batters argued farmers in the UK could not compete with their Australian counterparts and their “massive feedlots and soulless ranches” on a zero-tariff basis.
She wrote: “The Government says it wants to ‘level up’ Britain. But this can never be achieved by throwing our family farms under the bus.”
Brexiteer Tory peer Lord Hannan, meanwhile, accused the NFU of trying to preserve the status-quo, adding: “If we can’t do a proper trade deal even with our kinsmen Down Under, we might as well throw in the towel.”
The Department for International Trade said any deal with Australia will “not undercut UK farmers or compromise our high standards”.
Newly elected SNP MSP Jim Fairlie [below], who is experienced with farming, said: “These proposals pose a huge threat to Scottish agriculture, and I am deeply concerned about what this will mean for the future for my colleagues in the farming sector.
"Our seafood industry has already been hit hard by Brexit and now Scottish farming is next to be sacrificed - and once again, it’s Scotland's key industries which will bear the brunt of a Tory Brexit people here didn’t vote for."
He added that tariff-free access to farming would "completely betray" promises made by Tory ministers.
“Rather than safeguarding our world-class Scottish produce and protecting consumers, the UK Government is preparing to sell them out for a post-Brexit trade deal that could inflict untold damage on the industry.
"The Tories must urgently confirm that they will not throw our farmers under the bus by sacrificing world-class Scottish produce in pursuit of post-Brexit trade deals. Anything less than that would be simply unforgivable.”
This morning Environment Secretary George Eustice would not be drawn on reports of a row with Cabinet colleague Truss over the deal.
“I’m not going to get into discussions that are going on in government about individual trade agreements,” Eustice said.
“In any discussion on any part of government policy, and trade agreements are no exception, there’s a discussion and there’s a consensus.
“At the moment there’s a very clear consensus in government that we want to do a trade agreement with countries like Australia, but obviously on the right terms.”
He added: “I have very good discussions with all of my Cabinet colleagues on all issues where we have got a shared agenda.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel