THERE is a power struggle happening in Whitehall which could see many in Scotland’s traditional farming communities wiped from our landscape.
The Financial Times broke the story of a tussle between the Trade Secretary, Liz Truss, and Environment Secretary, George Eustice.
Michael Gove’s name appears in the frame, a passing wraith as he ploughs a furrow aimed at No 10. There are many within the food and drink sector who shake their heads in disbelief that the fate of one of our most crucial industries could be in the hands of three people so apparently ill-suited for the task, yet here we are.
Liz Truss is desperate for a deal to be done with Australia and New Zealand. Up until now, her trade mission has delivered little, much-vaunted trade deals being cut-and-paste versions we had with the EU with some of the perks shaved off.
READ MORE: Australia's zero-tariff demand to UK a 'huge threat' to Scottish agriculture
There is much about international trade which is complicated, a mix of Jenga and Risk with shadowy figures changing gameplay. For Scotland, with more than half of our farms still owned and run as family businesses, the stakes could not be higher.
According to Scotland Food and Drink, the industry is worth £15 billion to our economy and is Scotland’s largest employer. The impact on our communities is hard to quantify – how do you put a price tag on the intangible worth of a nation? Scotland IS the brand, but a reputation is hard earned and easy lost. The very real fear is that lower quality imports of food and drink will put our farmers – working to higher standards – out of business, while trashing our brand, damaging our markets, and making us reliant on low-quality imports with resulting impacts on our health and health services, as evidenced by outcomes in the USA.
But why would Liz Truss (above) agree to a deal which undermines our farmers, destroys our reputation as a nation, and sees our rural communities turned into glorified holiday resorts for trade only thought likely to boost the UK’s GDP by 0.02% over 10 years? One answer might lie in the Brexiter dream: an agreement with the USA.
If the UK diverges from the EU and its high standards, with an Australia/New Zealand deal, the complexities of the border in the Irish Sea and all the dangers that might pose to the Good Friday Agreement would be thrown into the pot without directly involving President Biden.
READ MORE: Why Tories' post-Brexit Australian trade deal is grave threat to Scottish farms
The Agriculture Bill and the Internal Market Bill passed through Westminster last year. Part of their purpose was to override Scotland’s devolved rights in agriculture. We could be about to see this play out across our landscape, in the safety of the food we eat, impacting on Scotland’s internationally respected name for quality.
The Trade and Agricultural Commission is an independent advisory board set up to advise Boris Johnson’s Government. The introduction to their report says, “We now embark on a new phase, as an independent trading nation.” The people of Scotland could do well to reflect upon that statement, and what we want it to mean.
Ruth Watson is the founder of the ‘Keep Scotland the Brand’ campaign
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel