CABINET Office officials are said to be worried that Dominic Cummings is set to accuse Boris Johnson, his former boss, of missing key meetings on the Covid crisis because he was working on a biography of William Shakespeare.
According to the Sunday Times, Johnson needed the money from the book to fund his divorce from his second wife Marina Wheeler.
The Prime Minister is said to have missed five Cobra emergency committee meetings at the beginning of the coronavirus crisis.
Cummings has launched an offensive on social media against the planning for the pandemic, and accused his former boss of having pursued a secret policy of herd immunity to fight the virus that that would have led to “catastrophe”.
READ MORE: The Queen to head royal 'charm offensive' to stop Scottish independence
His comments come ahead of his evidence to Wednesday’s joint hearing of the Commons health and science committees.
It is also thought he will reveal damaging details of the decision to decant patients from hospitals into care homes, where the virus claimed thousands of lives.
Cummings said planning for the pandemic was “AWOL” and “a disaster” and claimed that “awful decisions delayed everything” and made the first lockdown necessary.
He went on to accuse health leaders of failing to get mass testing up and running despite being told by Johnson and the then Cabinet Secretary Mark Sedwill to treat it as “a wartime project”.
Time, money and lives were “needlessly lost” he said, as a result of Whitehall’s “awful process”.
He added: “If mass testing had been developed properly earlier in the year as it could and should have been … we would probably have avoided lockdowns two and three while awaiting [the] vaccine.”
Home Secretary Priti Patel denied Cummings’s herd immunity claims, telling the Andrew Marr Show: “Our strategy was always about protecting public health, saving lives and protecting the NHS.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel