BORIS Johnson missed five Cobra meetings at the beginning of the pandemic.
As the novel coronavirus spread rapidly around the world and heads of state everywhere desperately looked to plan how best to respond, Johnson didn’t even bother going to the meetings.
Five times he missed those top-level discussions about how the UK should react to the oncoming storm, but it definitely wasn’t because he was working on a book about William Shakespeare to fund his second divorce.
However, some Unionists have got the perfect response to those statements of fact.
In an almost too stereotypical example of whataboutery, they say: “Nicola Sturgeon missed six.”
Tom Harwood, the soon-to-be GB News journalist who thought the man leading an independent review into whether Nicola Sturgeon broke the ministerial code was in the SNP because he read it on Wikipedia, has set them all off.
Isn't it funny how Nicola Sturgeon, who missed more COBRA meetings (6) than Boris Johnson (5) in early 2020, somehow escapes similar criticism.
— Tom Harwood (@tomhfh) May 24, 2021
The right-wing writer tweeted: “Isn't it funny how Nicola Sturgeon, who missed more Cobra meetings (6) than Boris Johnson (5) in early 2020, somehow escapes similar criticism.”
While Nicola Sturgeon did miss six Cobra meetings in early 2020, the comparison doesn’t exactly seem fair.
For the First Minister to travel from Bute House to 70 Whitehall, the address in London where the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms are, she would need to be driven around 400 miles. This would take about eight hours.
If she were to walk, it would take her more than five days of continuous movement.
READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: Promoting 'British values' is the last the thing the BBC should do
Boris Johnson, in comparison, lives about 160 yards from where the Cobra meetings are held - and that’s with Google Maps taking us the long way round.
The Scottish Government said it receives “only limited advance notice of such meetings”, which may go some way to explain the First Minister’s absences.
But what about Johnson’s? Does he need a lot of warning before he walks almost 150 metres?
Furthermore, Cobra meetings are held in the UK Government Cabinet Office for a reason: they’re UK Government meetings.
Unless something dramatic has changed that the Jouker is not aware of, Nicola Sturgeon isn’t in the UK Government. In fact, we remember hearing something about her wanting to end the UK altogether.
READ MORE: The Queen to head royal 'charm offensive' to stop Scottish independence
As her Scottish Government stressed in April 2020: “The First Minister has been chairing meetings of the Scottish Government Resilience Committee (our equivalent of Cobra) since 29 January."
How many of those meetings has Boris Johnson attended?
We're not the only ones who noticed Harwood's "misleading" tweet. Here's a few others:
Nicola Sturgeon isn't PM maybe??!!
— Mark (@markantro) May 24, 2021
Journalist? Or, Tory mouthpiece?
It's hard to tell with Tom🙄 https://t.co/VssJ0bmyqK
No, because it's misleading. Nicola Sturgeon was chairing meetings of the Scottish Government Resilience Committee (the Scottish version of COBRA), since January 2020. In addition, the Scottish Government also had ministers and officials at COBRA meetings. https://t.co/FaabsAWoN5
— Tom French (@tomfrench85) May 24, 2021
What to expect from GB news: Strawman arguments.
— HornedLivestock (@HornedLivestock) May 24, 2021
Objectively true, in terms that she missed more COBRA meetings. The comparison, however, is fallacious: she had representation at these meetings and on occasion was chairing the Scottish Government Resilience Committee. https://t.co/nCWuu49vPr
Yes. Because she's not the Prime Minister. https://t.co/LybAeqc7d0
— Brett Brabben (@BrabbenBrett) May 24, 2021
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel