DOMINIC Cummings gave seven hours worth of evidence to the Commons committee examining the UK Government’s handling of the pandemic – and it was certainly a rollercoaster.
The former senior aide to the Prime Minister launched into a series of bizarre accusations and revealed what was really going behind the scenes during key decision making moments of the pandemic. The National have picked out the top six weirdest moments from the committee session so you don’t have to.
POP AT STURGEON
CUMMINGS criticised the First Minister for diverging from the PM’s coronavirus plans, and said that Cobra meetings became “potemkin” – having a false or deceptive appearance – as officials were concerned about what Sturgeon would say on TV afterwards. He claimed the FM would be “babbling” on TV after the meetings, and therefore no-one would dig into the “reality or detail” of the crisis.
“ABSOLUTELY F****D”
CUMMINGS slipped into obsecenties as he told how a panicked civil servant in the Cabinet Office told him that the UK was “absolutely f****d” and that thousands of people may die because there was no real pandemic plan. He claims that on Friday March 13 – a week before the official lockdown – he was with scientist Ben Warner and the Prime Minister’s private secretary in the PM’s study, when Helen Macnamara, Deputy Cabinet Secretary, arrived and said the country was headed for a “disaster”.
SPIDERMAN
WHILE giving an example of what the situation in government was like when the pandemic began to unfold, Cummings referenced internet culture and use the Spiderman meme as a metaphor. He said: “You know that Spiderman meme with both the Spidermans pointing at each other, it’s like that but with everybody. So you have Hancock pointing at the Permanent Secretary and you have the Permanent Secretary pointing at Hancock and then both pointing at the cabinet office, the cabinet office is pointing back at them and all the different Spidermans are all pointing at each other saying ‘You’re responsible’.”
HANCOCK’S BEHAVIOUR
CUMMINGS didn’t make much effort to hide his disdain for the Health Secretary and said that while the PM was in hospital with Covid, Hancock let slip the government’s 100,000 testing target for the end of April. Cummings claims Hancock then interfered with the test and trace system so that he could reach his “stupid target” before going on to accuse the Health Secretary of “criminal, disgraceful behaviour” and insisted he should have been fired.
BARNARD CASTLE
JUST over a year to the day from his infamous Rose Garden press conference, you would assume that Cummings would show remorse for the Barnard Castle scandal. But, you would be wrong, as the former aide doubled down but said he understood why people thought it was strange. Cummings said: “If you’re going to drive 300 miles to go back to work the next day then pottering down the road for 30 miles and back to see how you feel after you have come off what you thought might be your death bed didn’t seem crazy to me.”
PM JAB ON TV
THERE was plenty of behind the scenes tales but the strangest one has to be the PM wanting to go on live TV to be injected with coronavirus to “reassure the public”.
Downing Street declined to deny the allegations.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel