SCOTTISH ministers have urged Priti Patel not to use "inflammatory and divisive rhetoric" on immigration.
The Home Office has been invited to urgent talks to ensure "there is no repetition of the events at Kenmure Street" earlier this month, when a return to so-called dawn raids provoked a massive community response.
According to Police Scotland estimates, around 500 people surrounded the Home Office van sent to take two men from their Glasgow home.
Sumit Sehdev and Lakhvir Singh were released after eight hours and have now enlisted solicitors as they challenge moves to deport them to India.
The men, a chef and a mechanic, have lived in Scotland for around a decade and supporters in the Pollokshields street chanted "let them go" in an event that brought fresh scrutiny to the UK's immigration regime.
In a speech earlier this week, Home Secretary Patel issued a warning to "those who seek to disrupt our enforcement officers", linking those raids to the deportation of serious criminals.
READ MORE: Priti Patel issues warning after Kenmure Street protest in Glasgow
There has been no suggestion that the Kenmure Street men are guilty of significant offences.
But Patel said: "I have a message to those who seek to disrupt our enforcement officers – they should think about whether their actions may be preventing murderers, rapists, high-harm offenders from being removed from our communities and they should think long and hard about the victims of these crimes.
"We will not allow such disruption to prevail."
Now Angus Robertson, Scotland's new Constitution and External Affairs Secretary, has invited Patel to open urgent discussions over a "a more humane approach to immigration enforcement".
In his letter, Robertson called for a new process which "reflects the views and values of Scottish communities and does not involve the heavy-handed approach of raids which are disruptive to our communities, are inherently divisive, risk public health and take up valuable police resources".
The letter states: "Any enforcement procedures in Scotland must be carried out with due regard to the safety of our communities and be aligned to our values of dignity, fairness and respect."
READ MORE: REVEALED: The Glasgow dawn raid the public did not witness
Robertson says the raid, carried out on Eid in an area home to a high proportion of Muslim residents, "failed that test" of showing "due regard to the safety of our communities" and being "aligned to our values of dignity, fairness and respect".
In her Monday speech, Patel said responsibility for immigration lies with Westminster - which has accused Scottish politicians of whipping-up opposition to its actions.
But the Edinburgh Central MSP said the Home Office move had "created an unnecessary situation requiring a significant police presence to ensure public safety" on May 13.
He went on: "I don’t consider inflammatory and divisive rhetoric suggesting that those taking action are protecting murderers, rapists and high profile offenders is helpful.
"We both know that it is inaccurate to suggest that all those subject to immigration enforcement have been linked to criminality.
"Clearly there will be some cases where swift action needs to be taken to remove individuals who present a risk but as the events at Kenmure Street showed, individuals facing deportation are often valued members of communities they have been part of for many years.
READ MORE: Fears for man held after 'secret' dawn raid as police stay silent
"Many of those subject to immigration enforcement have committed no crime and are no threat to the public, having simply exhausted their appeal rights.
"A more humane approach to immigration enforcement is required, one which reflects the views and values of Scottish communities and does not involve the heavy-handed approach of raids which are disruptive to our communities, are inherently divisive, risk public health and take up valuable police resources.
"I would welcome an urgent meeting to discuss how to ensure there is no repetition of the events at Kenmure Street in the future."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel