AN SNP MP rebuked a claim by a BBC News host about Scotland's Covid death rate.
Dr Philippa Whitford was brought onto the BBC News channel to discuss the pandemic following Matt Hancock's press conference about the coronavirus.
Host Clive Myrie talked about how the Scottish people think First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has handled the pandemic "pretty well".
However, he then moved onto say "there is consensus" that the handling of the situation in Scottish care homes was a "disaster" and that Scotland has one of the highest care home death rates per capita "anywhere in Europe".
READ MORE: Jeane Freeman tells of 'hurt' over portrayal of care home discharges
Dr Whitford quickly rebutted the BBC host's claims, saying: "Well I would just have to start with your care home deaths per capita. In actual fact, the England & Wales data from ONS [Office for National Statisitics] and the data from Scotland is almost exactly the same because you have to use excess deaths in the first wave, simply because people weren't being tested."
She added that a recent Nuffield Trust report and the London School of Economics both refuted the claims of Scotland's care home deaths.
Whitford continued: "There was about 11,000 care home deaths in England which were not put down to Covid, but clearly were. So when you look at excess deaths, it's about 45 per 100,000 in England, Wales and Scotland.
"We didn't do better, but we didn't do worse. This narrative that somehow Scotland did particularly badly - they didn't."
Dr Whitford said that at the beginning of the pandemic, the testing for Covid-19 was not where it is today and that the failure was "not looking at the ability of care homes" to isolate residents who had caught the virus.
UK Health Secretary Hancock highlighted in his conference that the so-called Indian variant is becoming the predominant strain in the UK.
READ MORE: Matt Hancock dodges question on 'lie' to PM over hospital discharge testing
In light of this, Myrie asked Dr Whitford about the June 21 date for full unlocking of Covid restrictions.
She highlighted that scientific groups like Sage (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) say the Indian variant is about 50% more infectious than the Kent variant, which was already 50-70% more infectious than the original virus.
This significant increase means that measures we adapted to in the first lockdown last year "may not be strict enough", according to Dr Whitford.
She added that with coronavirus cases rising in areas across the UK, it would be "foolhardy to tie yourself to the mast of the 21st of June when the Government's failure to control borders let it in and we're in danger of actually just letting a whole third wave occur".
READ MORE: Here are five reasons National readers stopped watching BBC's Question Time
She finished by criticising the UK Government's focus on opening back up and sluggishness on combatting rising variants of the virus.
Dr Whitford said: "I would have thought 15 months into this pandemic we would have learnt by now that you can't just pluck a date out of the air, pin it up on a board and somehow stick to it.
" We had 'it'll be over in 12 weeks', we'll be hugging by November', 'we'll have a normal Christmas'. You can't do that and even in the Government's four key measures, one of them is whether a variant derails things.
"It was a complete failure not to have India on the red list when Bangladesh and Pakistan were added. It allowed it in and now it is doing exactly what more infectious variants do - spreading in communities.
"To suddenly end all social distancing in the middle of rising cases to me seems foolhardy."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel