THE co-leader of the Scottish Greens has said the effect on the LibDems of forming a coalition government with the Conservatives is on the minds of senior party MSPs as they engage in co-operation talks with the Scottish Government – but she does not see that as a problem.
Lorna Slater, along with fellow co-leader Patrick Harvie, has been engaging in talks with the Scottish Government in recent weeks, with the decision made to formalise the discussions this week.
In the aftermath of the election a SNP/Scottish Greens coalition government was ruled out, but on Wednesday the First Minister revealed that discussions have been taking place which could see Greens MSPs become ministers.
Nicola Sturgeon said the end goal is a formal co-operation agreement between the two.
However, following the LibDem decision in 2010 to go into coalition with the Tories at Westminster the party was destroyed at the ballot box – dropping 49 seats and 15% of the vote in 2015.
“I think that’s on everybody’s mind, absolutely,” Slater told the PA news agency.
“I think both the Scottish Government and ourselves are taking a risk, as the First Minister said yesterday, to put this out there, to publicly announce that we’re interested in trying to find effective ways of tackling the climate crisis, effective ways of dealing with recovery by working more closely together.”
READ MORE: SNP-Green talks could result in a Yes majority government
She added: “The kind of arrangement that we’re probably looking at doesn’t look like what we would consider a coalition.
“That’s probably not the kind of arrangement we would look at, it’s probably something that’s a bit of a distance from that, a different kind of arrangement.”
The Greens co-leader also said it was the First Minister who made the first approach, contacting both Slater and Harvie to invite them to talk about a potential alliance.
While there is little known about the detail of a final agreement, Slater said it could mean the creation of long-term financial planning, meaning the Scottish Government could rely on the support of the Scottish Greens in such a way as to make longer-term financial commitments in the annual budgets.
Sturgeon said an agreement is not necessary because of parliamentary arithmetic (with the SNP having 64 MSPs and the opposition 64), but have said it is an attempt at cross-party working.
The decision to speak to the Greens could be seen as one made to increase leverage over Boris Johnson in getting his agreement to hold a second independence referendum.
But the new Lothian MSP said she would take the Scottish Government entreaties at face value.
“I don’t think I can second guess the motivation of the Scottish Government,” she said. Certainly the way they’ve presented to us in the approach they’ve made has been around wanting to change their approach on climate, wanting to be seen to take that seriously, to take action on it ... bring in the experts – bring in the people who have practical policies.
“I’m optimistic that means the Scottish Government are genuine in their interest to take a more serious and more integrated look – more joined-up thinking – on the climate crisis and how that depends on having a wellbeing economy.
“I’m taking it hopefully in the spirit which I think it was intended, with good intentions to really, genuinely make some transformative change.”
During the election campaign Harvie revealed in an interview with The National that he was open to a coalition with the SNP. SNP sources later said the party was interested in closer working with the Greens even if the larger party achieved a majority. In the event the SNP came one seat short of an overall majority.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel