INCOME tax has emerged as an early potential sticking point for a joint SNP-Green government.
Nicola Sturgeon announced on Wednesday that she had embarked on talks with the smaller pro-independence party about a “formal co-operation agreement” for this parliament.
Although it would stop short of a coalition, it could see Green MSPs entering government as ministers.
However the First Minister’s official spokesperson yesterday ruled out the SNP giving any ground on its manifesto commitment to freeze income tax for the five-year parliament.
“Our manifesto promise is clear and we’re not deviating from that,” he said.
The SNP manifesto contained a headline pledge to “freeze Income Tax rates and bands” for five years.
It added: “While it is important for any government to have flexibility to respond to a change in circumstances, our aim is to maintain current Income Tax rates for the duration of the parliament and increase thresholds by a maximum of inflation.”
However the Scottish Greens want higher income tax for high earners.
READ MORE: Official Better Together website now a pro-independence page after Yes hijack
The party's manifesto boasted that in the last parliament it had helped to deliver a “reformed income tax so that most pay less whilst the rich pay more, raising hundreds of millions of pounds for public services across Scotland”.
Although vague on details, it said a “more progressive approach to income tax at Holyrood” should continue with further hikes on the wealthy.
It said: “Now is not the time for increases in income tax for the majority of people in Scotland, many of whom have faced severe financial hardship as a result of the pandemic.
“However, there is widespread consensus that those who can contribute more, should.”
An SNP ban on income tax rises would be increasingly hard for the Greens to stomach if the economic recovery from the pandemic was rapid.
The tax difference may also bar the Greens holding any finance brief.
Asked if income tax changes were on the table or if the SNP would stick to its manifesto promise, the First Minister’s official spokesman said: “Our manifesto promise is clear and we’re not deviating from that.
“We’re not in a position to give a running commentary on the ongoing discussions with the Greens.
“There will be a continuous dialogue over the next few weeks as we build up towards the summer recess and we’ll see where that leads in terms of hopefully getting to a formal agreement.”
Asked if income tax was a red line for the Government, the First Minister's spokesperson said: “What I said is we stick to our manifesto commitment and I don’t foresee us deviating from that, because we’ve given a commitment. So that’s what I’m saying about that.”
READ MORE: Huge day of action for independence set to be held after fundraiser success
Asked about the Green demand for a total ban on foxhunting, the First Minister's spokesperson again said the Government would not give a running commentary on “what’s in, what’s out”, adding: “There will be ongoing discussion and we’ll see where that leads in the next few weeks.”
A spokesperson for the Greens likewise refused to get into a “running commentary” on the talks.
The Green manifesto also called for an end to new licences for oil and gas exploration, an end to tax breaks for the North Sea industry, and no more public funding for new road building projects.
It also called for an annual 1 per cent “millionaire’s tax” on wealth and assets above £1m, including land, property, pensions and other assets.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross warned Sturgeon she was risking “disaster” for Scottish businesses by linking up with the left-wing Greens.
At FMQs, Ross said the SNP Government was already regarded by some as “anti-business” and the potential deal with the Scottish Greens would only make that worse.
He said: “Instead of business people who understand how to create jobs, it’s the Greens who might get a seat around the First Minister’s table.
“A Green party that doesn’t even believe in economic growth and a Green party that wants to risk the entire oil and gas industry and the tens of thousands of jobs it supports.”
Sturgeon replied: “I think most people across the country, and most responsible businesses that I speak to, know that it is important to support a strong, vibrant, sustainable economy, but it is also vital - in fact it is a moral imperative - to do that in a way that meets our obligations to the planet and delivers our climate change targets.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Tory motives are unclear but free speech issues exist at universities
“From that last question, I’m not sure that the climate is particularly high up the agenda of Douglas Ross. We will continue to make sure that we support industry, that we support the economy, but that we also support the country to move to net zero [carbon emissions] which is a key priority, and should be a key priority for all of us.”
She later said her government was still committed to dualling the A9.
Ross added: “A nationalist coalition with the Greens is a disaster for anyone who was hoping to see an end to the SNP’s anti-business approach.”
The Scottish Greens said: “The Tories are in no place to talk about supporting businesses when Brexit has thrown so many Scottish firms to the wolves.
"Their interests are not in a real ‘reset’ which would empower ethical and sustainable community businesses to lead the recovery, but about going back to the failed economics which favoured big businesses who pay poverty wages, hide their profits offshore and donate to the Conservative party.
“Scotland faces unprecedented challenges and needs a new kind of politics, not outdated, unwanted Tory cronyism.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel