NEW research showing that sales of alcohol in Scotland fell by almost 8% after the introduction of minimum pricing has been hailed as “powerful, real-world evidence” of the success of the policy.
Scotland became the first country in the world to bring in minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol in May 2018, with it currently fixed by the Scottish Government at 50p per unit.
Researchers found alcohol sales in Scotland fell by 7.7% after the policy was brought in, when compared with the north east of England.
In Wales, which introduced minimum pricing almost two years after Scotland in March last year, there was an 8.6% decrease in sales when compared with the west of England.
The research, led by Newcastle University and published in The Lancet Public Health, found: “For both Scotland and Wales, reductions in overall purchases of alcohol were largely restricted to households that bought the most alcohol.” It concluded MUP “is an effective alcohol policy option to reduce off-trade purchases of alcohol and should be widely considered”.
The study looked at data detailing more than 1.24 million separate alcohol sales between 2015 and 2018, and also in the first half of last year – with this period covering purchases by 35,000 households.
People in high-purchasing, low-income homes, did not seem to change their habits, the research indicated.
One of the study’s authors, Professor Eileen Kaner from Newcastle University, said it was a “concern” those households did not adjust their buying habits, and “spending simply increased as a result of the MUP policy”. She said: “This is something that we want to explore further so we can better understand the reasons behind this, as well as its impact.”
Overall, Professor Peter Anderson from Newcastle University, who led the research, said the findings show “the introduction of a MUP in Scotland has made a significant impact on reducing alcohol levels, with a sustained drop in overall units bought by some of the highest-consuming households two years on”.
He added: “We can now see that the introduction of a MUP in Wales at the beginning of March 2020 has had a similar impact to the one we saw in Scotland in 2018 and we hope to see a continued benefit.
“This is an important step forwards in addressing high levels of alcohol-related health problems and social harm that is caused by too much alcohol consumption.”
Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance, said: “This is powerful, real-world evidence of the success of minimum unit pricing as a harm reduction policy.”
He called on the UK Government to follow the lead of Scotland and Wales and introduce minimum pricing for England.
Anderson said: “Westminster has said time and time again that it is waiting for evidence from Scotland and Wales on minimum unit pricing, meanwhile 80 people a day are dying from an alcohol-related causes. The evidence is here – it’s time for the Government to introduce minimum unit pricing in England in order to save lives, cut crime and reduce pressure on our NHS and emergency services.”
Alison Douglas, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, described the research as “hugely encouraging”.
She said: “Not only is MUP continuing to have the intended effect in reducing overall alcohol consumption in Scotland, it is those that tended to buy the most alcohol who are most likely to reduce the amount they purchase ... We are seeing early signs that this reduction in consumption may be beginning to translate into wider improvements in health, with a reduction of 10% in alcohol-specific deaths in the first year of MUP.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel