FOR the British royal family to consider something “too grand”, it’d really have to be ridiculously over the top.
It’d have to be something completely outrageous, so tone deaf that even the occupants of Buckingham Palace would deem it too grandiose.
Once again, Boris Johnson has succeeded where no-one else would have tried to succeed – proposing a project that is so outlandish the royal family have knocked him back.
The Prime Minister gleefully announced this weekend that he wants to splash the cash on a new British flagship, the successor to the Royal Yacht Britannia.
The vessel will promote British trade and industry around the world, according to the PM. Nothing says modern trading nation like a gigantic outdated boat.
The good news is the ship is a total snip, with a reported cost of up to £200 million.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson announces £200m flagship to promote 'best of British'
A name for the vessel has not been announced, but Johnson has faced pressure from campaigners and Tory MPs to name it after the Duke of Edinburgh.
One Whitehall insider appeared to confirm that the PM agreed, telling the Express the plan "needs to be confirmed by the Queen but the intention is to name it after the late Duke”.
Unfortunately, Buckingham Palace wants absolutely nothing to do with this scandalous embarrassment.
One senior royal source told The Sunday Times the ship was regarded as "too grand" a symbol to be used by the monarchy in the modern age.
They said: “It is not something we have asked for.”
The report stated that Buckingham Palace has not been involved in the planning process, and indicated the Queen is not in favour of naming the £200m ship after her late husband.
Without royal approval, we’ll leave it to our readers’ imaginations to come up with a more fitting name…
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel