A UNIONIST spin doctor has been slapped down after he tweeted to attack Lorna Slater, the co-leader of the Scottish Greens.
Paul Sinclair, who has worked with both Scottish Labour and the Scottish Conservatives, took to Twitter to respond to an interview Slater had given to the Press and Journal.
In that interview, the newly elected Green MSP said it was “risky and dangerous” to leave people dependent on oil and gas from the North Sea for their livelihoods as the sector would need to be phased out in the climate change battle.
In a tweet from the Scottish Greens, Slater is quoted as saying: “We all saw how Thatcher’s closing of the coal mines abandoned whole communities and left people destitute. We have the option not to do that."
READ MORE: SNP-Greens co-operation agreement 'worth the risk', Lorna Slater says
Sinclair took issue with this statement, tweeting: “Lorna Slater was 15 and living in Canada when Thatcher left office.”
Many social media users were quick to leap to Slater’s defence, pointing out that “she can read”.
Others said that the former Labour spin doctor appeared not to have “grasped the concept of studying history”.
Wait until he finds out I've got views on civil rights, women's suffrage, the Highland clearances and imperial colonialism... https://t.co/bUoPxI9JKe
— Lorna Slater (@lornaslater) May 30, 2021
One Michael Dee wrote: “My son was born in 1994, his masters degree in history has been destroyed by [this] tweet.”
Political commentator Angela Haggerty quipped: "Aye well I hadn't even been born when the Beatles were at their biggest but I still know all the words to Hey Jude."
Dr Sara Rich Dorman, a senior political lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, wrote: "Amazingly, I grew up in Canada in the 70s and 80s and knew all about Thatcher’s policies."
Amazingly, I grew up in Canada in the 70s and 80s and knew all about Thatcher’s policies.
— SRD 🏴🇨🇦 (@SRDorman) May 30, 2021
Responding to Sinclair’s post, Scottish Greens media manager Tom Freeman wrote: “Irrelevant. You can still see the impact on the communities abandoned by Thatcher today.
“Unless Paul’s point is that only people who were born in Scotland should talk about it, which seems pretty blood and soil nationalist to me.”
Slater herself replied: “Wait until he finds out I've got views on civil rights, women's suffrage, the Highland clearances and imperial colonialism…”
Wait until he finds out I've got views on civil rights, women's suffrage, the Highland clearances and imperial colonialism... https://t.co/bUoPxI9JKe
— Lorna Slater (@lornaslater) May 30, 2021
Despite his attack on Slater’s youth, Sinclair has, by his own admission, been active in politics from the age of 15. He said previously that he had joined the Labour party at that age and was still a member.
He went to work with the Scottish Tories ahead of the 2021 Holyrood elections where his Labour background had initially raised eyebrows but his “committed” support of the Union won out, according to reports in The Herald.
When asked if he was a crypto-Tory, Sinclair said previously: “Nonsense. I joined the Labour party on my 15th birthday and I’m still a member of the Labour party.”
However, The Scotsman reported in 2005 that, after being accused of “hawking his backside round the country" looking for a Labour seat to take in parliament, Sinclair said he had been head of the Conservative Club at Glasgow University.
READ MORE: Scotland’s 'hands were tied’ by Westminster Tories through Covid response
The Tories have been vocal in their criticism of the Greens entering government alongside the SNP, saying it will prove terrible for those working in Scotland’s oil and gas industry.
University of Glasgow academic Ewan Gibbs explained: “Slater’s point is that how closures are managed is hugely important.
“Pit closures in the 1960s - when the most jobs were lost - were organised to provide jobs for miners within the remainder of the industry and coordinated with manufacturing inward investment in the coalfields.
“As a result, whilst those earlier closures were hardly welcomed by miners they did not cause the sort of mass unemployment or the deterioration of labour markets for manual workers that the butchering of a modernised and productive coal industry did in the 1980s and 1990s.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel