THE decision to make travellers from Portugal quarantine may be “politically motivated”, an infection expert has said.
Portugal will be moved from the green to amber travel list, requiring visitors and returning holidaymakers to quarantine in the UK from 4am on Tuesday.
The UK’s Transport Secretary Grant Shapps blamed a rising infection rate and the apparent detection of a “Nepal mutation”, increasing concerns about the risk level.
But Dr Christine Tait-Burkard, an expert in infection and immunity at the University of Edinburgh, suggested the decision may be “retaliation” in response to European countries requiring Britons to quarantine on arrival.
READ MORE: Feeling tired? Researchers find two symptoms common in mild cases of Covid-19
Asked whether it was a necessary measure, Dr Tait-Burkard said: “Not necessarily in terms of case levels.
“Portugal is still very similar to the UK actually, and so that means the actual risk of going to the country is not necessarily higher than staying in the UK.
“What has made the decision to some extent is that Portugal now also has the Delta variant.
“We should probably not be surprised, given that British tourists went there and we have a large number of Delta variant cases.
“There’s also concern about a so-called Nepal variant which is kind of a mix of the Delta variants and the Kent (Alpha) variant.
“That is causing some concern, but it is a very last-minute announcement again.”
Speaking on the BBC Good Morning Scotland programme, she added: “It potentially is also a little bit politically motivated, seeing that many European countries have put the UK on the quarantine list.
“It might be a little bit of political retaliation behind that as well.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon denies pointing finger at Boris Johnson over Covid deaths
Sri Lanka, Egypt and five other countries will also be added to the red list, requiring isolation in a Government-approved hotel, it was announced on Thursday afternoon.
The news came on the same day the Government said a further 5,274 lab-confirmed cases of coronavirus had been recorded in the UK as of 9am on Thursday, the highest single-day figure since March 26.
Following the announcement, Portugal’s foreign affairs ministry said on its social media account that it “cannot understand” the “logic” of the decision.
It tweeted in English: “We take note of the British decision to remove Portugal from the travel ‘green list’, the logic of which we cannot understand.
“Portugal continues to carry out its prudent and gradual deconfinement plan, with clear rules for the safety of those who live here and those who visit us.”
President Rebelo de Sousa reacted angrily, saying the British government was obsessed with infection rates even though hospital admissions and deaths were at low levels. He described the UK’s stance as “health fundamentalism” and claimed it “does not recognise that we live in a different situation than we lived before vaccination”.
“The numbers are going up but they are not increasing inpatients and ICU numbers and deaths. It means they’re asymptomatic or they don’t cause stress to the health service,” he said. “It’s completely different from when there was no vaccination and when there was stress in the health service.”
Portugal’s seven-day rate of coronavirus cases per 100,000 people stands at 37.2, up from 30.7 a week earlier.
That figure in the UK is currently 28.6.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel