A PUMPED storage hydro scheme on the shores of Loch Ness worth £550 million has been given the green light by the Scottish Government.
The Red John scheme is expected to bring up to 700 direct and indirect jobs.
It works by pumping water from the loch to a storage pond on top of a hill at times when there is excess energy on the grid. At times of higher demand, the water flows back down through a hydro generator, producing 450MW of energy. Developer ILI says it will save 45 million tonnes of CO2 over the lifetime of the project.
The Red John scheme was approved by Scottish ministers on Monday after being referred to the Government’s reporter.
Mark Wilson, chief executive of the ILI Group, said: “This will help pave the way for hundreds of millions of pounds of investment and hundreds of new jobs in the area and will be another major step in Scotland’s ongoing journey to becoming a leader in renewable energy.
“This project alone will save over 45 million tonnes of CO2 over its lifetime.
“There is currently a pipeline of over 5GW of pumped storage in the UK but we need to work closely with the UK Government to implement the market mechanisms that are needed to drive investment into these projects to ensure we hit our net-zero targets”.
Energy Secretary Michael Matheson said: “The Scottish Government has long been supportive of pumped hydro storage for its role in ensuring resilience in our electricity supplies, and for the tremendous opportunity it provides to unlock the potential of renewable energy and support Scotland’s net-zero ambitions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel