CLAIM:
“Oxford University students removing a picture of the Queen is simply absurd. She is the Head of State and a symbol of what is best about the UK” – Gavin Williamson, English education secretary, June 8, 2021.
DOORSTEP ANSWER:
Oxford students have a right to free speech. Conservative ministers like Gavin Williamson are only trying to recruit the monarchy into saving the Union. Even those not supporting independence should be wary of Mr Williamson’s antics.
WHO IS GAVIN WILLIAMSON?
Williamson is the current Secretary of State for Education for England, though he is often introduced on the BBC as if he had responsibility for the whole UK.
Previously he was Defence Secretary under Theresa May, after Michael Fallon had to resign for touching up a female journalist. While defence boss, Williamson had dinner with Lubov Chernukhin, the wife of a Putin crony, in exchange for a £30,000 donation to the Conservative party. May sacked Williamson following a press leak from the National Security Council.
READ MORE: Tom Devine slams version of UK history in Government's citizenship test material
In revenge, Williamson ran the campaign for Boris Johnson’s successful bid to become Tory leader. In return, he was awarded the English education brief.
However, his many gaffs during the Covid pandemic have led to intense speculation in the Conservative press that he is to be dumped and replaced by Sajid Javid. In turn, this has led to many unattributed stories saying Williamson has threatened to reveal things about Johnson he saw during the 2019 leadership contest. It's possible that Mr Williamson’s latest royal tweet is part of his campaign to keep his job.
MR WILLIAMSON TAKES ON THE STUDENTS:
Oxford University students at Magdalen College recently voted to remove the Queen’s picture from their common room, because they view her as a symbol of British colonialism. It was this incident that led Gavin Williamson to tweet: “Oxford University students removing a picture of the Queen is simply absurd. She is the Head of State and a symbol of what is best about the UK. During her long reign she has worked tirelessly to promote British values of tolerance, inclusivity and respect around the world.”
Oxford University students removing a picture of the Queen is simply absurd. She is the Head of State and a symbol of what is best about the UK. During her long reign she has worked tirelessly to promote British values of tolerance, inclusivity & respect around the world
— Gavin Williamson (@GavinWilliamson) June 8, 2021
Williamson’s tweet got lots of media coverage. His stance was backed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, according to a No 10 spokesperson.
Oxford vice-chancellor Lord Patten (a former Tory minister) also weighed in, calling the students’ decision “offensive and obnoxiously ignorant”. All of this may seem something of an over-reaction politically.
However, Williamson’s tweet should be seen in the context of Conservatives at Westminster moving to limit anti-racist, anti-colonial and BAME protests in universities.
In February 2021, Williamson himself announced that he would introduce new legislation to fine English universities that are deemed to have allowed attacks on “free speech” and to give leave to anyone denied a platform to take legal action, i.e. anyone protesting a racist speaker could be sued.
Williamson also wants to impose directions on English universities to “promote free speech” as he defines it.
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AT OXFORD?
Magdalen College is hardly a bed of republican activism. Hundreds of staff and students turned out in 2008 to greet the Queen and Prince Philip when they visited as part of the College’s 550th anniversary. Prince William also went to visit in 2016.
On the 2008 visit, students and staff entered a ballot to have lunch with the Queen. There were 900 entries for 120 winning tickets. One student was quoted as saying: “I love the Queen, this is a very exciting visit.”
Magdalen College Middle Common Room (MCR) is a mini student union for post-graduates. It describes itself as “one of the biggest graduate communities of the traditional Oxford Colleges”.
Its website says: “Our graduates come from many different countries throughout the world, and have diverse interests, academic and otherwise.”
READ MORE: Even the Queen thinks Boris Johnson’s ‘royal yacht’ plan is ridiculous
The offending motion to remove the Queen’s portrait was proposed by the MCR President Matthew Katzman. He is a 25-year-old lecturer in computer science from Maryland, USA. Previously he studied at Stanford University.
Katzman, the son of top US lawyer Scott Katzman, claimed the move did not “equate to a statement on the Queen”. Rather, he said the painting was being taken down to create “a welcoming, neutral place for all members regardless of background, demographic, or views”.
So this affair hardly represents a prime example of the “cancellation culture”. It might just be that the mature, international students of the MCR preferred something more cosmopolitan on their café wall.
The Queen’s portrait has hung in the Magdalen common room only since 2013. The MCR committee will now consider replacing it with “art by or of other influential and inspirational people”.
ENTER CECIL RHODES:
The Magdalen College portrait affair has exploded just as Oxford was grappling with another issue – what to do with the statue of Cecil Rhodes at nearby Oriel College. No one can deny that Rhodes was a colonialist and a racist, as well as being a college benefactor.
Recently there has been a campaign supported by both students and staff to have the statue removed. After some dithering, Oriel College has rejected removing the statue.
For those tempted to see this as just another example of “cancellation culture” it is worth remembering that back in June 1899, 94 Oxford academics wrote to the university vice-chancellor to protest against bestowing an honorary doctorate on the still-living Cecil Rhodes. Mr Rhodes was controversial even in 1899.
The Magdalen vote to remove the Queen’s portrait has obviously emerged at a moment when Oxford is reassessing its past and when the Tory Government has decided to impose stricter state control on student politics. This perhaps explains the media and political over-reaction to the Magdalene Common Room decision.
CONCLUSION:
This over-reaction appears to have included threatening messages sent to students and staff following a Gavin Williamson’s not so subtle public intervention.
Barrister Dinah Rose, the president of Magdalen College, responded by defending the students’ right to “free speech and political debate”.
So if you are one of the people currently sending obscene and threatening messages to the College staff, you might consider pausing, and asking yourself whether that is really the best way to show your respect for the Queen.
— Dinah Rose (@DinahRoseQC) June 9, 2021
As part of a longer Twitter thread on the issue, she wrote: “If you are one of the people currently sending obscene and threatening messages to the College staff, you might consider pausing, and asking yourself whether that is really the best way to show your respect for the Queen."
FACT CHECK RATING:
The English education minister should go back to the classroom.
Gavin Williamson may not register much on the Scottish political radar, but both his attacks on university autonomy and his desire to recruit the monarchy as a tool to thwart Scottish independence need watching.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel