USING a Union flag backdrop at UK Government coronavirus press conferences while announcing rule changes for England caused “unacceptable” confusion over restrictions, according to a influential committee.
The constitution committee of the House of Lords has released a report on the UK’s Covid-19 response – and criticised Boris Johnson’s chosen backdrop during TV briefings on lockdown rules.
Lords were particularly critical of the Prime Minister’s announcement of a third lockdown for England, which was presented in front of a Union flag as usual.
“This may have created the impression that the legal changes applied throughout the UK when they extended only to England,” they wrote.
“The UK Government has failed to make it clear when announcements only extend to England.
“This has caused unacceptable and unnecessary confusion for members of the public throughout the UK.”
With health a devolved area, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales all make their own decisions on coronavirus restrictions.
READ MORE: Euro 2020: Unionists fume as Scottish pub fails to hang English flag in window
While during the first lockdown the nations decided to act largely in step, the first major change came when Johnson decided to change the pandemic messaging from Stay at Home to Stay Alert.
“This change was apparently made without consulting or informing the devolved administrations,” the committee said.
They wrote they were concerned that since this point in May 2020, communication and co-operation between the nations looks to have “decreased significantly” while rules have diverged.
Stuart McMillan (above), the SNP MSP for Greenock and Inverclyde, said the Tory government’s obsession with Union Jackery has now been “exposed as a direct risk to public health”.
“Their sole focus throughout the pandemic should have been clear and consistent public health advice,” he said.
“Instead, their fixation with plastering everything with a Union flag for political purposes resulted in ambiguous messaging that increased the risk to the health and wellbeing of citizens living beyond England’s borders.
“This is dangerous and unforgivable and the Westminster Tory government must learn the lesson that the protection of citizens is always a higher priority than political posturing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel