THERE is a “very strong case” for abolishing Scotland’s controversial Not Proven verdict, the new Justice Secretary has said.
But Keith Brown added that there are “complex issues” involving the verdict – which is not used in other parts of the UK – and these need to be carefully considered.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has previously said it is time to look at whether Scotland retains not proven, as part of efforts to tackle the “shamefully low” conviction rates for rape and sexual assault.
The SNP manifesto for May’s Holyrood election committed the party to consulting on its abolition.
Brown, who took on the justice brief after the election, said it is “fairly plain that amongst the various parties in this chamber there are different views” on the issue of Not Proven.
READ MORE: 'Not proven' verdict had its place, but must be binned in modern Scotland
He said it is right that a proper consultation is carried out, adding there would be “implications for other parts of the justice system” if the verdict is scrapped.
Brown stated: “We do recognise there is a very strong case that has been made for its abolition, but there are complex issues.
“And while I know many in the chamber support the move, it is right that we consider this very carefully.”
As part of reforms that ministers hope will create a “faster, fairer and more effective justice system”, Brown said the Scottish Government will appoint a Victims Commissioner to “provide an independent voice for victims”.
He also vowed “changes to ensure lifelong anonymity for complainers of sexual crimes”, saying this would further increase the confidence of victims to report such attacks.
Conservative justice spokesperson Jamie Greene said the SNP’s proposed reforms are “not going far enough and nor are they going fast enough”.
He said his party wants to see sentences doubled for those who commit crimes against emergency service workers, saying pleas for this have “largely fallen on deaf ears in recent years”.
READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: Third verdict is a Scottish legal oddity we could live without
He argued: “It is only right that those who go out of their way to harm our frontline personnel are punished accordingly.”
Greene also pledged the Tories would bring a Victims’ Bill to Holyrood, saying this would “contain a number of very specific actions that I think the Government can take right now to truly shift the balance”.
This would include Michelle’s Law, named after murdered teenager Michelle Stewart, allowing for families’ and victims’ views to be taken into account when decisions on the early release of prisoners on parole are being made.
The Conservative's bill would also seek to bring in Suzanne’s Law, named after Edinburgh book-keeper Suzanne Pilley, whose killer has never revealed the whereabouts of her body.
This change would mean parole would be denied to murderers if they refuse to say where they have hidden their victim’s remains.
Labour justice spokesperson Pauline McNeill welcomed the move to ensure the victims of sexual assaults remain anonymous.
“Many people think this is the case already, but it is not,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel