LABOUR has called for the UK Government’s ethics watchdog to investigate whether Michael Gove has broken the ministerial code and misled Parliament.
The party’s deputy leader and shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Angela Rayner has written to Prime Minister Boris Johnson demanding that Lord Geidt, the adviser on ministers’ interests, investigate a unit known as the Clearing House, based in the Cabinet Office, which handles Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
As Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Gove is the minister in charge of the Cabinet Office.
The unit has been criticised for how it operates amid concerns journalists were blacklisted and transparency was stymied by the way in which potentially sensitive information requests from across government were handled.
Following an appeal, an information rights tribunal ruled on Wednesday that the Cabinet Office must release certain documents to the openDemocracy website after a three-year fight.
READ MORE: Law lecturer explains the facts in the latest Tory Covid contracts case
Judge Chris Hughes said: “The profound lack of transparency about the operation of the Cabinet Office, might appear, from the material before this tribunal, to extend to ministers.”
Labour claimed this showed that past statements made by Gove about the operation had been proven untrue.
The Cabinet Office insisted it had never said the Clearing House did not exist, but had disputed accusations that journalists were blacklisted, among other practices.
A spokesperson said: “Any suggestion that there has been a breach of the ministerial code is wrong.”
In her letter, Rayner said: “Because of the lack of transparency regarding the operations of the Cabinet Office Clearing House, the truth about the operations of the unit – and therefore whether Mr Gove misled Parliament by saying that ‘all freedom of information requests are treated in exactly the same way’ – will be revealed in the documents that the judge has ruled must now be released.”
READ MORE: Tories' government-by-grift only strengthens case for Scottish independence
But the Cabinet Office spokesperson added: “A Clearing House function was set up by the last Labour government in 2004 to help ensure there is a consistent approach across government to requests for information which go to a number of different departments or where requests are made for particularly sensitive information.
“We remain committed to transparency and always balance the need to make information available with our legal duty to protect sensitive information.
“In order to be as transparent as possible we have released the vast majority of information that was requested in this case and have already published a considerable amount of information on Clearing House, including a gov.uk page explaining its purpose and remit.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel