ROYAL intervention in the second independence referendum could bolster Republican arguments for an elected head of state, a top historian has said.
Professor Sir Tom Devine said that any attempts by the monarchy to wade in on the indyref debate would be a “cack-handed” approach that would have the opposite effect of its intentions.
It comes amid reports there are fears in the Royal Household that politicians are “losing Scotland”, and plans for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to spend more time up north as part of the UK’s “love-bombing” mission to save the union.
READ MORE: Prince William and Kate hold secret talks with Gordon Brown on independence
However, Scotland’s leading historian has said that involving the monarch in such a highly political debate could actually prop up the Republican cause for an elected head of state.
Devine said that it would change the perception of the royal family. He said: "If this ill-framed plan goes ahead the royals will be seen to have become politicised on one of the great issues of our time.
"The House of Windsor will not be regarded as coming out in support of the Union of Crowns but rather, rightly or wrongly, of being used by unionist politicians to shore up a controversial political union, the future of which currently divides the Scottish nation down the middle.
READ MORE: William and Kate could be asked to come to Scotland more in bid to save Union
"Ironically, this cack-handed approach may only give comfort to the substantial number of nationalists who wish for an elected head of state in the event of independence.
“That way lies real danger for the Crown in Scotland."
Pointing to a YouGov poll from March where 63% of adults in the UK said they wished to maintain the royal family, compared to only 50% of Scots, which was also the lowest figure for any part of the UK.
Devine added: "That should be a clear warning to the royals that they need to treat Scotland with great care.
"In a constitutional monarchy they have to avoid being in any way publicly involved in politics and especially in matters of current bitter constitutional controversy."
The historian explained that current SNP policy isn’t a threat to the monarchy if an independent Scotland became a reality, because although the Treaty of Union would be repealed but the Queen and her successors would remain monarchs of Scotland as queens or kings of Scots.
READ MORE: Royal staff 'accused crew filming Gordon Brown of trespassing on public street'
Rather than young royals - such as William and Kate - "love bombing the Scots", Devine said the Queen should advise the Prime Minister "of the importance of returning to the tradition of partnership and respect for Scotland".
He claimed that Boris Johnson had "brazenly undermined that long tradition which gave stability to the union state and by so doing have contributed more to the present constitutional crisis than any number of militant Scottish nationalists".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel