BORIS Johnson repeatedly remarked to European Union leaders that the United Kingdom was “indivisible”, as Dominic Raab claimed they had been “offensive” by suggesting Northern Ireland was not part of the country.
The comments came after Emmanuel Macron reportedly suggested Northern Ireland was not part of the UK during his talks with Johnson in the margins of the G7 summit.
At a closed-of-summit press conference in Cornwall, Johnson commented: “Of course we make the point continuously we are part of one great, indivisible United Kingdom.”
French president Macron used his G7 summit press conference to call for calm – but also insisted the terms of the Brexit deal must be honoured.
“I’m doing things very calmly,” he said. “I believe that as far as this subject matter is concerned, everybody has got to come back to reason.
“My wish, my will, is that we succeed – we succeed collectively – to put into operation what we decided upon a few months ago.”
Earlier, Raab had told Sky News: “We have serially seen senior EU figures talk about Northern Ireland as if it was some kind of different country to the UK.
“It is not only offensive, it has real world effects on the communities in Northern Ireland, creates great concern, great consternation.”
He added: “Could you imagine if we talked about Catalonia, the Flemish part of Belgium, one of the lander in Germany, northern Italy, Corsica in France as different countries? We need a bit of respect here.”
Raab also told Times Radio: “There was more than one senior European figure talking about this at this summit and I’ve heard it for years now.
“And the truth is Northern Ireland cannot be talked about as a separate country to the UK. It’s offensive. And that kind of approach speaks volumes.
“That is one of the reasons we have the problems we do with the Northern Ireland Protocol, because there isn’t a proper appreciation and there’s been a lopsided approach.”
When asked about the Foreign Secretary’s comments, Johnson said: “What I am saying is that we will do whatever it takes to protect the territorial integrity of the UK, but actually what happened at this summit was there was a colossal amount of work on subjects that have absolutely nothing to do with Brexit.”
The row risked overshadowing the G7 summit, but Johnson insisted it had taken up only a small part of the time in Carbis Bay.
“The vast, vast majority of the conversations that we have had over the last three or four days have been about other subjects and there has been a fantastic degree of harmony between the leaders of our countries,” the Prime Minister claimed.
The G7 summit saw the leaders agree to pledge more than one billion doses of coronavirus vaccines, either directly or through funding to the Covax initiative.
The leaders also made new pledges in a bid to combat climate change across the globe, including an aim to meet net-zero emissions no later than the year 2050.
The group committed to cutting emissions and seeking to limit the rise in global temperatures to 1.5 degrees, and will look to conserving or protecting at least 30% of land and oceans by 2030.
On these promises, the Prime Minister said: “While it’s fantastic that every one of the G7 countries has pledged to wipe out our contributions to climate change, we need to make sure we’re achieving that as fast as we can and helping developing countries at the same time.”
Johnson added that the countries that took part in the G7 summit – the UK, US, Canada, Japan, France, Germany and Italy, along with guests Australia, South Africa, India and South Korea – were united by “democratic values”.
The summit – the first attended by Joe Biden as US president – has been an opportunity for democracies to band together as a counterweight to autocratic regimes.
“It’s not good enough for us to just rest on our laurels and talk about how important those values are,” Johnson said.
“And this isn’t about imposing our values on the rest of the world.
“What we as the G7 need to do is demonstrate the benefits of democracy and freedom and human rights to rest of the world.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel