ANDY Burnham failed to inform Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar that he would be launching an attack on Nicola Sturgeon over the Scottish Government's Covid-19 travel ban.
The Labour mayor of Greater Manchester made the admission in a heated interview this afternoon after hitting out over not having been told about the new travel restrictions between Scotland and Greater Manchester before they were announced on Friday.
Over the weekend he has repeatedly accused the First Minister of double standards and acting like the Conservative government for not consulting with him. The Scottish Government has often complained of not being told of major UK decisions before they are announced.
But Burnham has now left himself open to accusations of hypocrisy by not pre-warning Sarwar - who would normally be charged by Labour of holding the Scottish Government to account - that he was about to make a high profile criticism of Sturgeon.
"I didn't tell him," Burham told BBC Scotland in an interview with presenter John Beattie who asked him if he had told Sarwar before criticising the Scottish Government over the travel ban.
"I am speaking for my residents. It is not a matter of politics. If it was a matter of politics I may have told him ... I didn't do that ... I don't think you should adopt should a biased approach in this interview."
Beattie said he was not being biased but was asking questions.
Burnham also admitted on the show that he had not told Sarwar that he would be demanding compensation from the Scottish Government for residents of Greater Manchester who had had to cancel trips to Scotland as a result of the new restrictions.
Sturgeon and Burnham are engaged in a war of words over the Scottish Government's decision to impose a Covid-19 travel ban on parts of north west England from today.
The Greater Manchester mayor has said he felt people in his region had been "insulted" by the First Minister's approach and a lack of consultation.
The First Minister defended her decision and suggested Burnham was seeking to "generate a spat" with her in order to position himself in a future Labour leadership contest.
On Friday, Sturgeon said that all non-essential travel from Manchester and Salford would be banned due to rising coronavirus cases.
This prompted anger from Burnham at the weekend, who said the move was disproportionate and should have been communicated to his administration beforehand.
The First Minister was asked about Burnham's reaction on BBC News today.
She said: "These are public health measures. I have a duty, and it's one I take very seriously, to keep Scotland as safe as possible.
"I'm sure Andy Burnham feels the same sense of duty toward people in the Greater Manchester area.
"I've always got on well with Andy Burnham and if he wants to have a grown-up conversation he only has to pick up the phone.
"But if, as I suspect might be the case, this is more about generating a spat with me as part of some positioning in a Labour leadership contest in future, then I'm not interested.
"We've all got a serious job of work to do right now and I'm serious about doing that job in a way that keeps Scotland as safe as I possibly can."
Earlier, Deputy First Minister John Swinney also defended the decision to impose a travel ban.
Swinney also said Burnham's call for compensation is not "a relevant point".
He told the Today programme: "We have in place, in Scotland, business support that we have made available to companies to try and sustain them, there will be support in place in England for exactly the same circumstances.
"We have got to take decisions based on the data that presents itself and sometimes that is very uncomfortable data for us.
"We have to act quickly to try to make sure we are doing everything possible to suppress the spread of the virus, and that is what members of the public would expect of us."
Burnham responded to the First Minister's comments later, saying he would be writing to her asking for compensation for people affected by the ban.
He said: "I find that insulting, not for me, but for people here who are directly affected by what she announced.
"It's not just the direct impact on Greater Manchester, it's on our reputation as a city.
"If the First Minister of a country stands up at a press conference and announces that the UK's second city is going under a travel ban, it has an impact.
"People elsewhere in Europe, around the world, hear that. So it's not like it's just a sort of more localised thing between us and Scotland, it has an impact on our city region.
"I don't think we've been treated with the respect we deserve and I'm talking mainly there of the people of Greater Manchester, not myself."
He continued: "It's had an impact with people with holiday cottages booked, people who are having to go for work reasons.
"So to suggest, as the First Minister has done today, 'Oh, this is all about politics and posturing', well say that to them, say that to those people.
"Why is Bolton under a travel ban today, when it has a case rate that is quite a lot lower than Dundee? How is that fair?"
The Prime Minister's official spokesman was also asked about the travel ban on Monday.
He said: "Health is a devolved matter. It is for the Scottish Government to explain that decision."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel