A CLOSE relative of the woman who allegedly engaged in an extramarital affair with Health Secretary Matt Hancock is a top executive at a firm which has been handed a slew of NHS contracts, reports say.
Hancock has been forced to defend his conduct after The Sun published pictures allegedly showing him kissing Gina Coladangelo, a close friend from his university days who he secretly hired as an adviser in 2020.
The two are both married to other people and their relationship had previously led to accusations of a “chumocracy” when it emerged Coladangelo had also accompanied Hancock to confidential meetings with civil servants, and visited No10.
READ MORE: Matt Hancock accused of cheating on his wife with close aide Gina Coladangelo
Now, Sky News have reported that Roberto Coladangelo, believed to be the brother of Gina Coladangelo, is an executive director of strategy for Partnering Health Limited (PHL Group).
That firm, according to its website, is “an established company dedicated to offering quality solutions and services to NHS and private healthcare partners”.
Hancock has previously been accused of cronyism after it emerged that he held shares in a firm owned by his sister and other family members which had won NHS contracts.
It was claimed that Hancock had omitted to declare his connection to the company in the relevant register of interests. He denied any wrongdoing.
There is currently no suggestion that the PHL Group acted improperly in its procurement of government contracts.
Sky News said that they had been unable to find the value of PHL Group's NHS contracts or the timing of their award, but that a “person close to the situation” claimed PHL had been providing services to the NHS since it was established 11 years ago, and that contracts awarded by the NHS followed the relevant procurement rules.
A PHL spokeswoman said the company would provide a statement "later this evening".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel