THE SNP have said UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock has serious questions to answer over whether he broke the ministerial code.
A CCTV image published in The Sun newspaper yesterday showed Hancock kissing Gina Coladangelo, who he was close to at Oxford University. The paper alleged that the Health Secretary was engaged in an “affair” with Coladangelo.
It comes after questions emerged over how Coladangelo, the director of a lobbying firm and a university friend of the Health Secretary, was given a series of roles at the heart of Whitehall – including a £15,000 role on the board of his department.
Hancock has been married to his wife Martha for 15 years, and they have three children.
As well as working for her husband’s firm, Oliver Bonas, Coladangelo is a director and major shareholder of lobbying firm Luther Pendragon, which offers clients a “deep understanding of the mechanics of government”.
READ MORE: Why we should pay attention to the Matt Hancock affair, but not the 'affair'
Hancock appointed Coladangelo to the Department for Health and Social Care last year, initially as an unpaid adviser in March, before she was appointed as a non-executive director.
The ministerial code sets out: “On appointment to each new office, ministers must provide their permanent secretary with a full list in writing of all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. The list should also cover interests of the minister’s spouse or partner and close family which might be thought to give rise to a conflict.”
Despite mounting pressure, the Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said that Boris Johnson had accepted Hancock’s reasoning and “considers the matter closed”.
A YouGov poll yesterday found that 79% of Scots believe Hancock should resign.
SNP Westminster deputy leader Kirsten Oswald MP said: “The stench of cronyism and sleaze surrounding this Tory government grows stronger with each day that passes.
“Despite the Prime Minister and Health Secretary’s best attempts to brush this entire episode under the already stuffed carpet, the reality is that there are very serious questions for Matt Hancock to answer over whether or not he broke the ministerial code.
“The code makes clear the rules around conflicts of interests and partners and spouses.
“While aspects of this may be private, public appointments, use of taxpayers’ money and conflicts of interest warrant proper scrutiny.
“It would be a remarkable coincidence that Matt Hancock’s very close university friend just so happens to be the best person to be appointed to this influential position.
“The bottom line is there must be a full independent public inquiry into Tory sleaze and cronyism without any further delay.
“The Westminster system is rotten to the core and broken beyond repair. Instead of putting up with it, Scotland can shake off Westminster and build a fairer and more democratic future as an independent country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel