JUSTICE Secretary Robert Buckland has said Matt Hancock “frankly worked without a break” to tackle the coronavirus pandemic as health secretary.
Hancock quit the role after images and video showed him in an embrace with close aide Gina Coladangelo last month.
Buckland told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Matt Hancock is no longer the health secretary – he resigned on Saturday, and I’m amazed we’re having a discussion like this.
“He resigned because he considered the matter carefully, he could see the issue of credibility was one that was really majoring.
“Matt Hancock had been I think an incredibly hard-working health secretary over the last three years, in fact, but in the last 16 months somebody who frankly worked without a break to deal with this crisis.”
Asked about Boris Johnson’s delay in getting rid of the Cabinet minister, Buckland told Sky News: “I think there was a swirl of things going on here.
“There were of course the private life matters and indeed as the hours went by it was clear there was, I think, an understandable groundswell of concern about how important it is that those who set the rules keep to them.
“It took a day or so but the right outcome was achieved and it was correct for Matt Hancock to resign.”
READ MORE: Matt Hancock's resignation shows Scotland must ‘say goodbye’ to UK
Buckland also said he is confident “due process” was followed in appointing Coladangelo to a paid role at the Department of Health and Social Care.
He added: “Everything that I understand so far leads me to believe due process was followed in the appointment of this person and any declarations that should’ve been made were made.
“I have information that suggests due process was followed and I have no reason to doubt or dispute that.”
But pressed on when Hancock’s relationship began with the aide, Buckland said: “I’m confident that due process was followed and that declarations were made, as to when the relationship began I’m afraid I don’t know.”
READ MORE: Tory peer investigated for helping 'chum' Matt Hancock with aide's security pass
Hancock wrote to Boris Johnson on Friday and said: “The last thing I would want is for my private life to distract attention from the single-minded focus that is leading us out of this crisis.”
Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said there must be “full transparency” and a “full investigation” amid claims Hancock used a private Gmail account.
She told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “I’ve written to ensure that there is an investigation into ministers using private emails to conduct official Government business in secret, agreeing contracts in private etc.”
She added: “We need full transparency on this and a full investigation.”
Buckland said ministers must use Government emails instead of Gmail, adding: “We should use Government emails, I think that’s very clear.
“I think the Cabinet Office, if they’re asked to look at this, they probably will be, will need to satisfy themselves that if that was the case then the material is available.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel