MICHAEL Gove has denied using taxpayer funds for party political polling and said he did not sign off Covid-19 contracts to gauge public opinion on the Union.
The National’s sister paper The Herald reported that at the height of the pandemic he instructed civil servants to commission polls on “attitudes to the UK Union” using an emergency contract given to Public First for research on the pandemic.
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford called on the Prime Minister to launch a public inquiry into the affair, telling the Commons the Tories could not be trusted.
He said: “Let’s be very clear what happened here, these emergency Covid contracts were supposed to be used for things like PPE, for our brave doctors and nurses fighting Covid.
“Instead, during the height of this deadly pandemic, Mr Gove used these emergency contracts to commission political research on – and I quote – ‘attitudes to the UK Union’.
“What’s worse, he handed these lucrative contracts to long-time friends and former employees. In essence this was a UK Government contract that sanctioned corrupt campaigning.”
READ MORE: Ten questions for Michael Gove on Covid cash used for Union polling
We asked Gove at a news conference in Scotland what additional taxpayer funds had been used for political research during the pandemic, to which he replied: “We don’t use taxpayer funds for party political polling … our concentration has been on making sure that we can get an effective public health message and that was the aim behind the investment.”
He added: “The contract was actually assigned by others and not by me, and the contract was assigned in order to ensure that the UK Government was in a position to be able to make sure that vital messages – hands, face, space, protecting the NHS – were communicated effectively to the public because clear messaging is an important part of public health overall.”
Gove went on to dismiss claims that Boris Johnson’s former adviser Dominic Cummings had said that the PM was “not that interested in the Union”.
He had previously claimed he could not see the UK Government approving a second independence referendum before the next General Election, and was asked – if they were returned to power – whether it could be held after that poll.
However, Gove refused to be drawn: “I’m not very good at making predictions. I once wrote a book called Michael Portillo, the Future of the Right, and therefore, on that basis anyone should assume that I'm not a particularly good political clairvoyant. For the moment, I'm concentrating on Covid recovery.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel