HEALTH minister Lord Bethell faced fresh calls to stand down over his use of a personal email account rather than official communication channels.
Downing Street acknowledged Bethell was using a private email address but suggested that was allowed within the rules, while the peer insisted he had done nothing wrong.
Both the minister and his former boss Matt Hancock have faced claims that they used their private accounts to discuss government business during the pandemic, including potential coronavirus contracts. Bethell insisted he sought to uphold the ministerial code “in everything I do” as he was questioned by peers.
Pressed by Tory peer and former Boris Johnson aide Lord Udny-Lister if he “routinely” uses his private email, Bethell said: “In terms of the use of private email can I just reassure members that I have read the ministerial code, I have signed the ministerial code and I seek to uphold it in everything I do.”
Responding to concerns raised with him in the upper chamber, the Tory frontbencher said: “I am absolutely rigorous to ensure that Government business is conducted through the correct formal channels.”
Contracts were negotiated by officials, not ministers, and went via “departmental digital boxes”, with decisions communicated “through secure governmental infrastructure”.
Bethell said: “The guidelines are clear – it is not wrong for ministers to have personal email addresses and I have corresponded with a very large number of members in this chamber from both my parliamentary address and from my personal address and that is right and I will continue to do so.
“In their enthusiasm, third parties often seek to engage ministers through whatever means they can find and that includes their personal email.
“That is not the same as using a personal email for formal departmental decision-making.
“I’d say that those who have seen material on the internet should judge it extremely sceptically because distorted fragments of evidence do not provide sufficient grounds to rush to judgment on how ministers do their business.”
The Good Law Project, which has fought a series of legal battles over coronavirus contracts, published a leaked email to Bethell’s private account from Lord Feldman regarding an offer to supply Covid-19 test kits.
The Sunday Times reported that both Hancock and Bethell routinely used private accounts to discuss government business.
Downing Street insisted on Monday that “both the former health secretary and Lord Bethell understand the rules around personal email usage and only ever conducted Government business through their departmental email addresses”.
But yesterday the Prime Minister’s official spokesman suggested the use of personal emails to conduct government business was acceptable if the information was copied to an official account.
Asked if he recognised that the released emails showed that Bethell was using a private email address, the spokesman said: “Yes, we have been clear that ministers are able to communicate in a variety of different ways as long as they adhere to the guidance as set out.”
The “important point” was that ministers ensured that “when there have been substantive discussions or decisions generated in the course of those communications they then ensure relevant information is passed on and is accessible”.
Keeping emails off government servers could potentially make it easier to avoid transparency requirements and Freedom of Information laws.
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said: “Lord Bethell used his private email account to sign off contracts and the Government tried to cover it up.
“Sack him, publish the private emails and hand them over to the public inquiry.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel