FRESH questions for the security services have been raised after it emerged Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab’s private mobile number has been available online for a number of years.
The discovery came weeks after it was revealed Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s phone number was freely available on the internet for more than a decade.
The Foreign Office said that Raab’s number and other private information was swiftly removed once the department was made aware of the oversight.
The Guardian, which first reported the number’s availability after being notified by a reader, said it appeared to have been online since before he became an MP in 2010.
A Foreign Office spokesman said: “Private information was wrongly retained online, before the Foreign Secretary’s appointment.
“Once we were made aware, we had it removed immediately. Most of it was out of date, and no security was compromised.”
Labour shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy accused Raab of a “staggering lapse in security”.
“This should be the subject of an investigation,” she said.
“Both the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary have failed to protect their own phones. How can we be assured they aren’t as careless with sensitive intelligence and diplomatic cables too?”
In April, it emerged that Johnson’s number remained on the bottom of an online press release from when he was shadow higher education minister in 2006.
That disclosure – by the Popbitch gossip newsletter – prompted concerns that Johnson had left himself vulnerable to covert activity by hostile states.
The Prime Minister had already been reportedly told by civil service head Simon Case to change his number, because it was too widely known from his career as a journalist.
Former UK national security adviser Lord Ricketts told the Guardian: “The wide availability of Mr Raab’s personal phone number must increase the risk that other states, or even criminal gangs, have been able to eavesdrop on his calls.
“It also means that anyone who happens to have had his phone number ... is able to lobby the Foreign Secretary, bypassing the official channels which everyone else has to use.
“Anyone taking on a role as sensitive as this should in their own interests pay as much attention to online as to physical security,” Ricketts added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here