A LEADING philosopher says it is “unconscionable” that Scotland has been dragged out of the EU by an England which only sees it as a “useful appendage”.
Professor AC Grayling, who was one of 200 high-profile names who signed a “love-bomb” letter in 2014 urging Scots to vote for the Union, said it meant he has now completely changed his mind on independence.
Speaking in an event last week organised by campaign group Pro Europa, the academic said that his reasons for wanting to keep the UK together had revolved around having grandparents from England, Scotland and Wales.
But he said: “I have now come to the view that it is unconscionable that Scotland, which voted to be in the EU, should be dragged out by England which pays so little attention, has so little interest and care really for Scotland, other than as a useful appendage.”
Grayling, who is campaigning to reverse Brexit, said he was now a Yes supporter and if an independent Scotland rejoined the EU, it would be a “big shock” which would change the mood in England.
“The ideal future is that the nations of the British Isles – the Scots, the English, the Welsh, the Irish, all of them as members of the EU, we have no borders, we have no problems,” he added.
He said he believes it is inevitable that the UK – or its “current constituent nations when they are no longer part of the UK” – will be back in the EU.
“If we did nothing whatever, we would be back in the EU in due time, probably if we did nothing sometime in the 2040s,” he said.
“But it seems to me to be important that we get back very much sooner than that, so we minimise the degree of divergence that there is between the UK and our EU fellows.”
READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill accuses SNP of missing ‘historic’ independence opportunity
Grayling is calling for opposition parties to now form an alliance for the next Westminster election on a platform of seeking electoral reform.
He said this would mean the current first-past-the-post system could be replaced, leading to a more balanced parliament which could put the question of being in the EU back to a vote again.
This was likely to be a more realistic option than the idea of federalism suggested by former prime minister Gordon Brown, he argued, which would be heavily resisted by English Tories.
“A federal Britain would be one in which a very definite, explicit set of constitutional arrangements existed in which something like Brexit would not have been able to happen if Northern Ireland and Scotland voted against it,” he said.
“It is that kind of thing Gordon Brown has in mind.
“It is extremely unlikely to happen … because the English Conservatives are going to be extremely reluctant to give up their grip on power.
“It is too easy for them to get power under the current arrangements, they can run everything, they can deny Scotland and Northern Ireland and Wales a bigger voice and more independence.”
The “love-bomb” open letter was organised by TV historian Dan Snow and signed by 200 individuals from the worlds of sport, film, television and literature including Mick Jagger, Judi Dench and David Attenborough.
Published the month before the 2014 referendum it said: “We want to let you know how much we value our bonds of citizenship with you and to express our hope that you will vote to renew them. What unites us is much greater than what divides us. Let’s stay together.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel