REPORTING Scotland is more critical of the Scottish Government than the UK-wide News at Six is of the UK Government, research carried out by The National found.
Political stories put out on both evening news programmes were monitored from June 28 to July 2 and categorised by their framing towards each government.
Nine stories from the News at Six, and 11 stories from Reporting Scotland, were separated based on whether they were framed in a negative/critical, neutral or positive way. Negative or critical framing tended to lead with ministers or individuals being “accused of”, having to “defend” or “facing criticism”.
While three of Reporting Scotland’s 11 political stories during the period were negative/critical of the Scottish Government, not a single News at Six package had a negative framing towards the UK Government.
READ MORE: BBC News under fire for confusing messaging on Covid restrictions
Jenni Minto, the SNP MSP for Argyll and Bute, has said these findings should “set alarm bells ringing”.
Most political items on the UK-wide News at Six were neutral towards the UK Government – these included Sajid Javid saying we need to learn to live with Covid, the Prime Minister setting out changes to restrictions, compromise over the Northern Ireland protocol, changes to furlough and Labour winning the Batley and Spen by-election, which included comments from Boris Johnson.
Politics stories by framing on BBC News At Six and Reporting Scotland, June 28 to July 2
The half-hour programme also featured one story framing the UK Government in a positive light as Johnson welcomed 1600 new jobs Nissan is introducing in north-east England.
Last Tuesday, when the Scottish Government announced it was ending travel restrictions between Manchester and Salford and Scotland, the News at Six also ran a negatively framed story about Holyrood ministers. The story focused on the criticism of the travel rules from Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham.
North of the Border, Pacific-Quay-based Reporting Scotland took a harder approach to broadcasting stories critical of the Scottish Government. During the set time period, the programme ran three negatively framed pieces – on whether the Test and Protect system is fit for purpose, leading with Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie, business anxiety over a possible deal between the SNP and Greens, and the First Minister defending Scotland’s contact tracing scheme, featuring comment from Glasgow list MSP Annie Wells.
READ MORE: BBC's director general drops Scottish 'power grab bid' after outcry
Two Scottish Government stories, on plans for Covid restrictions easing, were presented in a neutral light while one, on an extra £10 million for cancer diagnosis and treatment, was positive.
Four stories about the UK Government had a neutral framing, while just one was negative as the SNP “joined Labour” in calling for an inquiry into former health secretary Matt Hancock’s affair scandal.
When political stories from both Reporting Scotland and the News at Six were combined, just one was negative or critical about the Westminster government while four were negative or critical about the Holyrood government.
Reporting Scotland political stories by framing June 28 to July 2
“The findings of this research should set alarm bells ringing,” commented Minto.
“How can the BBC meet its own guidelines – which state that its news output must deliver ‘due impartiality’ – while the main network news takes a softball approach on the UK Government?
“We expect scrutiny of the SNP and the Scottish Government – and we demand the same levels of scrutiny of Boris Johnson and his Tory UK government.
“It is up to the BBC to show that it can be even-handed, otherwise any remaining trust for the BBC that exists in Scotland will evaporate.”
A spokesperson for the BBC said: “Journalists across the BBC always strive for fairness, accuracy and impartiality in their reporting of news stories for our audiences across all our platforms.”
BBC News At Six political stories by framing June 28 to July 2
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel