SCOTTISH Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie has been accused of telling “pure unadulterated lies” after she launched an attack on the nation’s vaccine roll-out.
Baillie, the MSP for Dumbarton, had tweeted to pressure the Scottish Government to reduce the waiting time between doses of the Covid jag to four weeks.
She wrote: “Our vaccine effort lags behind the rest of the UK—which is why now is the time to follow WHO [World Health Organisation] guidance and cut the time between jags.
“The MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] has said that the 2nd dose can be given after 4 weeks.
“America and Australia have cut waiting times. We can’t afford not to act.”
READ MORE: This is the stark truth about Scotland’s coronavirus death toll
Responding to Baillie’s claim that Scotland’s vaccine roll-out is lagging behind the rest of the UK, SNP MP Gavin Newlands accused the Labour MSP of trying to take “the public for fools”.
Newlands wrote: “This is just pure unadulterated lies. Scotland is ahead of England and Northern Ireland on the vast majority of vaccination criteria. Jackie takes the public for fools.
“The sad thing is I've a feeling that the media will repeat her claim without giving the context that it is, in fact, pish.”
This is just pure unadulterated lies. Scotland is ahead of Eng & NI on the vast majority of vaccination criteria. Jackie takes the public for fools.
— Gavin Newlands MP (@GavNewlandsSNP) July 13, 2021
The sad thing is I've a feeling that the media will repeat her claim without giving the context that it is, in fact, pish.#COVID19 https://t.co/hZIT2W9mHq
SNP councillor Lisa-Marie Hughes echoed the attack, writing: “This is nonsense. Scotland is ahead (narrowly to be fair) of England and Northern Ireland. This is data you can Google in seconds.
“All this does is put down folk who are working extremely hard to protect us all.”
Official UK Government data shows that, as of July 12, Scotland has given 88.9% of its adult population the first dose of the Covid jag. This is ahead of England (87.1%) and Northern Ireland (81.6%), but slightly behind Wales (90.2%).
Scotland is currently third in terms of second doses given, on 65.5%. Wales leads on 73.2%, followed by England (66.2%), with Northern Ireland slightly behind (on 65%).
Across the UK, 87.3% of the adult population has been vaccinated with the first dose, and 66.4% have also received the second. Scotland’s figures are then largely in line with the UK average.
Responding to Baillie’s claim, Health Secretary Humza Yousaf accused her of talking down the “brilliant efforts of our vaccinators”.
He wrote: “This is simply untrue, we don't lag the rest of the UK, why talk down the brilliant efforts of our vaccinators? On various different measures we are ahead of England and Northern Ireland.
“Your demand that we ignore the expert advice of JCVI is irresponsible.”
This is simply untrue, we don't lag the rest of the UK, why talk down the brilliant efforts of our vaccinators? On various different measures we are ahead of Eng & NI.
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) July 13, 2021
Your demand that we ignore the expert advice of JCVI is irresponsible. https://t.co/SPcTwgiJtr
Scottish Labour has referred to advice from the WHO, MHRA, and the vaccines’ manufacturers, which says that second doses can be administered after three or four weeks, depending on the brand.
However, both the Scottish and UK governments have followed the advice of the Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisations (JCVI) throughout the pandemic.
Professor Adam Finn, a member of the JCVI and the chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, said the indications were that a longer gap offered better protection.
"There's a sweet spot, and at the moment the advice we have given is we should not reduce the interval less than eight weeks," he said.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon confirms move to Level 0 Covid restrictions with 'modifications'
"There is an advantage in giving the second dose early, in the current circumstances with all the cases that we are seeing because you get a further boost. But the downside is probably that will mean the duration of protection you get from that second dose will be shorter."
The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has been shown to offer higher protection with a longer gap, but evidence is less clear for the others.
The JCVI has already changed their advice once, in May, from recommending a gap of 12 weeks to one of eight.
That decision was taken in order to balance the extended protection against the speed of the roll-out and ensure people “have the strongest possible protection from the virus at an earlier opportunity”.
READ MORE: Blow for Labour as experts say no benefit to reducing Covid jag interval
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said Baillie's claims were based on the above data, which shows Scotland is third in the UK in terms of percentage of the adult population who are fully vaccinated.
Baillie said: “The SNP are more concerned with deflecting criticism than dealing with the challenges our vaccine programme faces.
“The numbers speak for themselves – whether the government want to admit it or not, the roll-out is slowing.
“We cannot afford to drop the ball on vaccinations at this crucial moment.
“The scientific evidence is clear that cutting the time between vaccines is safe – the SNP need to stop delaying and act now to get the virus under control.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel