SCOTTISH Tory MPs voted to cut the UK's international aid despite claiming just 12 months before that the higher level of funding "saves lives", the National can reveal.
John Lamont had said in June last year that the UK Government was right to maintain the commitment to spend 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) – despite the fact Lamont, along with all other Scottish Tory MPs, voted yesterday to slash the foreign aid budget to 0.5% of GNI.
Lamont tweeted: "It is right that @GOVUK keeps our commitment to spend 0.7% GNI on international aid. This saves and improves lives across the globe. Very welcome news to see the Scottish DFID jobs at East Kilbride protected as well."
It is right that @GOVUK keeps our commitment to spend 0.7% GNI on international aid.
— John Lamont MP 🇬🇧🏴 (@John2Win) June 16, 2020
This saves and improves lives across the globe.
Very welcome news to see the Scottish DFID jobs at East Kilbride protected as well. 🇬🇧🏴🌍@foreignoffice @DFID_UK https://t.co/IfpseE1Spq
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson brands Tory colleagues 'bloody disgrace' as UK cuts foreign aid
The Tories voted last night to cut the foreign aid budget by almost £4 billion despite warnings from charities that it will risk thousands of lives in the poorest parts of the world.
The Tories saw off a revolt of 25 of their own MPs, including former prime minister Theresa May as well as condemnation from former prime ministers David Cameron and John Major and former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson, winning the vote by 333 to 298.
Not big enough. For colleagues' who stood on manifesto after manifesto committed to this, it's a bloody disgrace. https://t.co/XPulJaxtPY
— Ruth Davidson (@RuthDavidsonPC) July 13, 2021
But the MP for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk wasn't the only Scottish Tory MP to have his words come back to haunt him as Andrew Bowie also stated in 2020 that he was "proud to defend" the Tory commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on foreign aid.
In a tweet from June last year, Bowie said: "Very proud to defend the fact that we are one of only six countries to consistently meet our commitment to spend 0.7% GDP on Foreign Aid. As we will continue to do more effectively now."
Very proud to defend the fact that we are one of only six countries to consistently meet our commitment to spend 0.7% GDP on Foreign Aid. As we will continue to do more effectively now.
— Andrew Bowie MP (@AndrewBowie_MP) June 16, 2020
The West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MP saw furious backlash from social media users.
One user asked: "Hang on. You’ve just voted to scrap this. What changed your mind? Johnson tell you which way to vote?"
Bowie is yet to respond to any of the criticism.
READ MORE: PMQs: SNP MP asks Boris Johnson does he feel 'no shame'
The vote comes despite a manifesto commitment from the Tories to maintain the current level of foreign aid.
The 2019 Conservative General Election manifesto pledged: “We will proudly maintain our commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on development, and do more to help countries receiving aid become self-sufficient.”
The 2017 manifesto promised: "Global leadership on development, backed by spending 0.7% of our national income with new rules to spend it more effectively."
The National has approached the Scottish Conservatives for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel