MOST National readers don’t think the UK Government should allow the Cambo oil field off the coast of Shetland to go ahead.
The Cambo oil field, co-owned by Siccar Point Energy and Shell, is due to start drilling in 2022.
The project plans to start by drilling for 150 million barrels of oil – equivalent to the annual pollution from 16 coal-fired power stations.
There are an estimated 800 million barrels of oil that will be produced over the next 25 years at the site, causing outrage amongst environmentalists.
READ MORE: Cambo oil field: What does it mean for climate targets?
The impact of producing and burning that amount of crude oil is equal to 10 times Scotland’s emissions.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has said that to meet the 1.5°C target in the Paris Agreement, there should be no more development of new oil, gas, or coal.
Oil and Gas UK (OGUK) are in charge of approving the licence for the project, but there have been calls for the UK Government to step in and stop it going ahead amid fears of the impact on climate targets.
And National readers agree, out of 168 votes on our poll asking if the UK government should allow the oil field to go ahead 73% said no, while 27% said yes.
READ MORE: Cambo oil field: 'Resolutely reject' Shetland field UK told
Some readers said that the Scottish Government should be the one making the decision, and others that focus should be on renewable energy as we aim to reach climate targets.
The UK government aims to reach Net Zero emissions by 2050 – when the Cambo oil field is due to finish production. In Scotland, the Government is aiming for Net Zero in 2045.
It comes as a renowned climate scientist and a coalition of activists have called on the UK Government to “resolutely reject” the plans.
Dr James Hansen, a former Nasa scientist who testified about climate change in 1988, and groups representing young people, parents and activists across the UK are calling on the proposals to be ditched.
READ MORE: Cambo oil field: Scottish Greens call UK an 'embarrassment'
The UK Government has been slammed for their “hypocrisy” ahead of COP26, a UN climate conference, which is due to be held in Glasgow later this year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel