AUDIENCE figures show GB News attracted no viewers during some broadcasts this week after a boycott due to a presenter taking the knee on air.
Host Guto Harri performed the anti-racism gesture on Tuesday in solidarity with players from the England football team who received racial abuse online following their loss in the Euro 2020 final.
The decision to perform the gesture caused bosses at the channel to issue a statement yesterday saying the gesture was an "unacceptable breach" of their standards.
It is unclear whether Harri, a former spokesperson for Boris Johnson during his time as London mayor, is still with GB News after the incident.
READ MORE: GB News denounces presenter for taking the knee live on air
Analysis by the Guardian of audience viewing figures from rating agency Barb has shown that showed that GB News received no measurable audience on two separate occasions the day after Harri took the knee.
Analysis showed that during business editor Liam Halligan and former Labour MP Gloria De Piero's show on Wednesday afternoon there was no measurable audience. During the same time, BBC News had 62,000 people watching and Sky News attracted 50,000 viewers.
The audience then dipped to zero again at 5pm during a programme hosted by former BBC presenter Simon McCoy and former Ukip spokesperson Alex Phillips.
Viewing figures eventually recovered later that night, with a peak of 47,000 during Dan Wooton's late-night show.
The rating figures are calculated by Barb based on monitoring boxes attached to thousands of homes along with data for online TV viewing.
READ MORE: GB News mocked after Welsh version of Paw Patrol gets better TV ratings
Harri's decision was defended by fellow presenter Neil Oliver on Tuesday who tweeted: "My @GBNEWS teammate @Guto_Harri is right to say and do as he sees fit. I do the same. That’s the ethos of the channel. Free speech. We don’t all agree with each other - that’s the point, or else where’s the debate?"
My @GBNEWS teammate @Guto_Harri is right to say and do as he sees fit. I do the same. That’s the ethos of the channel. Free speech. We don’t all agree with each other - that’s the point, or else where’s the debate?
— Neil Oliver (@thecoastguy) July 13, 2021
However, many of the channel's viewers signalled they would not be watching GB News with the channel itself releasing a seemingly statement last night.
It said: "GB News stands four square against racism in all its forms. We do not have a company line on taking the knee. Some of our guests have been in favour, some against. All are anti-racist. We have editorial standards that all GB News journalists uphold.
"On Tuesday a contributing presenter took the knee live on air and this was an unacceptable breach of our standards.
On Tuesday a contributing presenter took the knee live on air and this was an unacceptable breach of our standards.
— GB News (@GBNEWS) July 15, 2021
They later added: "We let both sides of the argument down by oversimplifying a very complex issue."
READ MORE: Andrew Neil to take a break from GB News after just two weeks of presenting
The statement appeared to have an effect, with many in the replies to the tweet signalling that their boycott of the channel would end and saying they would now give GB News a "second chance".
Others pointed out that the statement contradicted itself and seemed contrary to the channel's free speech ethos.
One Chris Moore replied to the statement on Twitter, saying: "On the face of that, I’m disappointed.
"If GB News wants to be known as a channel which gives all shades of opinion and politics, then you should have let it go. Otherwise it turns into an echo-chamber for people with one point of view."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel