THE 225th anniversary of the death of Robert Burns will occur this week. It was on July 21, 1796, that the man who was already recognised as the National Bard died at the age of just 37, almost certainly from endocarditis caused or exacerbated by rheumatism.
Over the last two weeks I have described Burns’s death and the immediate aftermath of his passing, which included the establishment of a fund to assist his long-suffering wife, Jean Armour, in her widowship in which she would be caring for the Bard’s children, the last of whom, Maxwell, was born on the day of his father’s funeral.
As promised, I will try this week to describe the legacy of Robert Burns and I will start with the bold assertion that he almost single-handedly preserved Scots as a language. I will go further, and declare that Burns played a great part in preserving the nationhood of Scotland. Were it not for Burns, I suspect we would all now talk Home Counties English, and the “North Britain” movement that was very much developing during his lifetime – people who wanted Scotland to be wholly inculcated into the motherland of the British Empire – might well have triumphed.
Burns saw the danger clearly. In 1793 he composed Scots Wha Hae, to the old bagpipe tune of Hey Tuttie Tattie, and left no one in doubt of his patriotic feelings. His bitter song Parcel of Rogues correctly blamed the hireling traitors for selling out their country in 1707, and I have always had a soft spot for his poem/song Caledonia with these words:
“Thus bold, independent, unconquer’d, and free, Her bright course of glory for ever shall run, For brave Caledonia immortal must be.”
READ MORE: A fitting burial for the ploughman who became our nation’s Bard
To understand Burns’s chief legacy you have to be aware of the context of his times. The Scottish Enlightenment was very much ongoing, and there was genuine disagreement among Scots of a political and philosophical kind as to where the country was going. Radicalism had taken root in Scotland, though many like Burns were afraid to openly espouse the causes that had revolutionised France and the USA.
A sense of cultural loss was evinced by many Scots in the latter years of the 18th century as “Britain” took over. Yet with his own songs and poems, and his astonishing contributions to collections of Scottish tunes and lyrics – he wrote or preserved about 700 of them – Burns turned the tide of Anglicisation. He directly influenced Sir Walter Scott – they met only once in Edinburgh while Scott was still a teenager – who in turn ramped up the vision of Scottishness being preserved. And it was.
Burns was not well served by his first biographers. Well-meaning friends raised money to have a Life of Burns published, the profits going to the poet’s family, and Dr James Currie, 1756-1805, was given the task. With access to the Burns family and friends, and particularly his great friend Mrs Dunlop, Currie published The Complete Poetical Works of Robert Burns: With Explanatory and Glossarial Notes; And a Life of the Author in four volumes in 1800.
Currie was a strong advocate of temperance, and the biography basically painted Burns as an incurable drunk. That image stuck with Burns for decades after his death until several writers and historians pointed out the bleedin’ obvious – if Burns had been such a lush, how come he was able to write so brilliantly and copiously?
The irony, of course, is that preservation of Scottish culture and Burns’ immense contribution to it was hugely advanced by a worldwide phenomenon – Burns Suppers and Burns Clubs. From long personal experience, the Suppers are rarely alcohol free and I suspect most Burns Clubs would not want to be.
The Suppers are unique – there are no Shakespeare Swallys, as National columnist Kevin McKenna might term them, nor Dickens Dinners or Byron Brunches, but each year on or around January 25, devotees and members of the public gather to be entertained and to learn about Scotland’s poet and toast his Immortal Memory. An excuse for a bevvy? Yes, but the tradition has kept his name and works alive for more than 200 years.
The first Burns Supper was held by nine of his friends on the fifth anniversary of his death in 1801. The first Burns Club was founded in Greenock in 1801, and suppers and clubs began to spread across Scotland beyond, helped by the spread of the British Empire in the 19th century. But Burns was not just a Scottish or British phenomenon – the Americans embraced him with President Abraham Lincoln a huge devotee, and the universality of his work saw him lionised in Russia and China.
READ MORE: The final sorry days of Burns as cold swims failed to save the Bard
There are said to be more statues of Burns around the world than any other secular or non-royal figure and he is reported to be worth a nine-figure sum to the Scottish economy each year as visitors come to find about about him.
I leave you with a very optimistic note supplied by the Robert Burns World Federation which states on its website: “Since its establishment in 1885, the Federation has been the official organisation representing over 100,000 Burnsians in every part of the world. With the technology available today...we are presented with a fantastic opportunity to deliver, at pace, that knowledge and understanding of Burns works to individuals, schools and colleges across the world.”
They are setting up a Lifelong Learning Unit within their head office in Kilmarnock, creating a library of books on Burns and other Scots writers, an educational resource and a digital presence.
With 225 years having passed since his death, it seems that the legacy of Robert Burns is set to grow and grow.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel