A SYRIAN grandfather has told of his heartbreak after receiving a Home Office letter refusing his request to be united with his grandson – after the child had died.
Nidal Ali Al Naboulssi, 57, found a new home in Kirkintilloch, East Dunbartonshire, in 2017 after fleeing the war in Syria via Lebanon.
He had hoped his daughter and her two sons would be able to join him from Lebanon, where she married a fellow Syrian refugee, and he applied to the Home Office to allow the family to reunite on compassionate grounds. However, while Al Naboulssi was awaiting an answer, his younger grandson Mohamad died on April 1 at the age of three.
He never had the chance to meet Mohamad, and Al Naboulssi said that when the document refusing the application arrived in June it included a refusal for the youngster, which “made us cry more”.
Al Naboulssi said: “When we got the letter from the Home Office, my wife and I were heartbroken. Our wound was reopened when we saw the refusal for Mohamad, the one who passed away.
“The Home Office were made aware that he had passed away since the time we made the application, but they still sent us a refusal letter.
“This made us cry more. Even though he is dead he has been refused. My first grandchild was around a year-and-a-half at the time we left for Scotland. He had just started speaking, and he would say ‘Grandaddy, I love you.’ He’s five now and I miss him a lot.
“My second grandchild, who was three when he died, I never got the chance to give him a hug, to give him a cuddle, to kiss him.
“We spoke only on WhatsApp phone calls and video. When we received the bad news that his heart had stopped, I couldn’t speak.”
READ MORE: Priti Patel rejects calls for Windrush scheme to be removed from Home Office
Commenting on the document, he said: “We thought the UK was a place where human rights were respected. How could they send us a document like that?”
Al Naboulssi and his family crossed the border from Syria to Lebanon in 2012, after bombing and air strikes left them fearing for their lives.
In Lebanon, where roughly half of all school-age Syrian refugees do not have access to education, Al Naboulssi struggled to find a school that would enrol his eldest daughter Battoul, who is now aged 25.
Unable to continue her studies, she married a fellow Syrian refugee.
With little chance of rebuilding their lives in Lebanon, Al Naboulssi and his daughter both registered with the United Nations refugee programme. The family was later offered resettlement in Scotland, however because his daughter had become part of a separate household, she was not included.
He is now calling on the Home Office to allow his daughter, her surviving child Ahmad and her husband Wael Almikdad to join the family in Scotland.
Al Naboulssi’s MP Stuart McDonald said: “The circumstances around the enforced separation of Mr Naboulissi and his family are truly heart-breaking.
“I have long criticised the UK’s family reunion rules as too harsh and restrictive, but even I am appalled that this case isn’t considered exceptional, or the circumstances compassionate enough to justify allowing the family to be reunited.
“I really hope someone in the Home Office will see sense and allow this family to come together to rebuild their lives.”
Al Naboulssi’s lawyer, Usman Aslam of Rea Law, said: “Family reunion really is not a big ask. It is a route to safety, but more importantly it is a legitimate way for those separated by war and persecution to be reunited again.”
The Home Office has been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here