DRILLING the Cambo oil and gas field is incompatible with Scotland’s climate change targets, the Scottish Greens have said.
MSPs are being urged to back a motion submitted by the party opposing plans for a new offshore drilling site near Shetland.
It comes amid fears the UK Government is set to approve plans for the Cambo oil field ahead of the Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow this year.
If given the go-ahead, a further 150-170 million barrels are due to be extracted from the North Sea bed at the site, which is expected to operate until 2050.
The proposals were given an initial exploration licence in 2001 but the Greens’ motion says the Cambo oil field now “contradicts recommendations” from the International Energy Agency report on achieving net-zero targets.
READ MORE: Cambo oil field: Edinburgh activists block UK Government building
Scottish Green climate spokesman Mark Ruskell said: “The North Sea already has more oil than we can afford to burn if we are to meet the Paris climate commitments and secure our survival, so approving new fields would be a catastrophic decision by the UK Government.
“It’s important that the Scottish Parliament is clear in the messages it sends ahead of Cop26, and that starts with urging the UK Government to see sense on this.
“I urge MSPs of all parties to back my motion.”
A spokeswoman for the UK Government’s Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy said: “The original licensing approval for the Cambo oil field dates back to 2001.
“The Secretary of State [Kwasi Kwarteng] is not involved in the decision whether to grant consent for the Cambo oil field.
“While we are working hard to drive down demand for fossil fuels, there will continue to be ongoing demand for oil and gas over the coming years, as recognised by the independent Climate Change Committee.”
Despite the end date for the oil field being five years beyond when Scotland aims to meet its net-zero target, Oil and Gas UK chief executive Deirdre Michie claims the proposal would actually help the UK cut its carbon emissions.
READ MORE: Cambo oil field: National readers want UK Government to stop project
In an opinion article for The Scotsman earlier this week, Michie said there would still be demand for oil and gas in the UK if plans to drill fields such as Cambo were rejected.
She said: “Instead, the country will have to import it from overseas – frequently from countries with higher emissions and less commitment to act on them.”
Michie said the industry had agreed a plan with the UK Government to reduce its carbon emissions, known as the North Sea Transition Deal.
She continued: “Projects like the Cambo field are part of a low-carbon journey that will support energy security, jobs, the economy and the net-zero future that everyone wants to see.
“Like all future UK oil and gas projects, the Cambo field is designed with lower-operating emissions in mind.
“It has been built ‘electrification-ready’, with the potential to import renewable power when it becomes feasible in the future.
“It is in line with the industry’s decarbonisation targets, and it is included in the country’s long-term energy projections.”
In response, Ruskell said the oil and gas industry “cannot be trusted to plan for its own decline”.
He added: “Deirdre Michie’s claim that opening a new oil field is ‘part of the low-carbon journey’ is audacious doublespeak from an industry determined to keep expanding fossil fuel production even when the world is committed to reduce it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel