JACOB Rees-Mogg has apologised after being accused of using an “extremely offensive racist term” in the House of Commons.
The Commons leader used the phrase “Yellow Peril” in response to a question from an MP.
The term is considered a racist and derogatory metaphor for a perceived threat from East Asian people to the West.
Rees-Mogg said he did not know what he said was racist and added his use of the term was “out of ignorance”.
READ MORE: Even Jacob Rees-Mogg knows outrage over 'rot in hell' tweet is ridiculous
Tory MP Damien Moore had said people in his constituency felt “under attack from the vindictive policies of Labour-controlled Sefton Council” for trying to “impose a cycle network”.
In reply, Rees-Mogg said: “I hear gossip that (Mr Moore) is actually working in collaboration, and whisper it quietly, with the Liberal Democrats in his area against these schemes, which I think shows how completely lunatic they must be to have created an alliance between him and the Yellow Peril.”
Shadow Commons leader Thangam Debbonaire called on him to apologise.
Raising a point of order, the Labour MP said: “Unfortunately, and I hope that the Leader is doing this unintentionally, the Leader made use of an extremely offensive racist term, I find it really difficult to understand but I am sure it may be possible that he was not aware that it was, in relation to the Liberal Democrats.
“It would be really helpful if the Leader could reconsider his words.
“He has spoken powerfully and correctly over the last few months about the scourge of racism and his commitment to ending it.”
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg: Ministers had it 'easier' due to lack of scrutiny during pandemic
She added: “This use of casual racist phrases, however unintentional, does have an impact.
“It has a corrosive impact on the fight against racism which I know he shares as an aim.”
Rees-Mogg replied: “If I have used a term that is offensive I apologise profoundly.
“I had absolutely no intention of using a term that was offensive.
“I don’t actually know what term I used that was offensive, so if out of ignorance I have, I apologise.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel