NICOLA Sturgeon has backed lifeboat crews after they were abused by right-wing critics for rescuing refugees and migrants in the English Channel.
The First Minister spoke out on social media as the head of the RNLI defended the actions of emergency responders, saying "decent people" deem their efforts "humanitarian work of the highest order".
Mark Dowie, RNLI chief executive, said he felt compelled to comment after volunteers reported being heckled for bringing migrants to safety.
Sturgeon replied: “Beyond depressing that saving human life is work that an organisation is forced to ‘defend’. Migrants are human beings whose lives matter. Thank you, @RNLI for all that you do.”
Beyond depressing that saving human life is work that an organisation is forced to ‘defend’. Migrants are human beings whose lives matter. Thank you, @RNLI for all that you do. https://t.co/FY2IidVvaD
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) July 28, 2021
Dowie said the sea charity was "doing the right thing" by going to people's aid, regardless of their reason for being in the water.
He told the PA news agency: "The people of [the UK and Ireland] fundamentally are decent people, and all decent people will see this as humanitarian work of the highest order.
"Our crews should not have to put up with some of the abuse they received."
A London RNLI crew hit out on social media at the weekend after volunteers were verbally assaulted.
Crews also described being on the receiving end of an "angry mob" after coming back from a rescue, with members of the public shouting at the migrants to go "back to France".
Ukip founder and GB News host Nigel Farage has also branded the RNLI a "taxi service for migrants".
READ MORE: Nigel Farage's 'revolting' GB News report from English Channel sparks fury
Dowie said RNLI volunteers simply wanted to prevent people dying at sea, adding: "We have seen the negative reaction to the issue over the course of the last five years, since this route was opened up.
"It's polarising, but it's humanitarian work of the highest order. That's what we should remember.
"Our volunteers get out of bed in the middle of the night, leave their employment, leave their families, and go out and do this because they believe in doing the right thing. Never doubt their commitment to that.
"If you look at social media, around almost any issue you will find very strong views one way or the other. We are doing the right thing."
We're proud of the lifesaving work our volunteers do in the Channel – we make no apology for it. Those we rescue are vulnerable people in danger & distress. Each of them is someone’s father, mother, son or daughter - every life is precious. This is why we launch: pic.twitter.com/lORd9NRpdP
— RNLI (@RNLI) July 28, 2021
The life boat chief explained that migrants' dinghies were often overloaded and inadequate for such a perilous journey, with poor conditions on board and people suffering exposure, dehydration or other sickness, having sometimes spent more than 30 hours trying to reach the British mainland.
"We have seen life jackets made out of lemonade bottles strung together, women and children, young men, old men, with no life jackets, in the middle of nowhere, with ships going past just hundreds of yards away,” Dowie said.
"It's a very, very frightening environment for those people.
"The most abiding reaction of people who made this journey is just one of absolute relief to get on to a (rescue) vessel which is more suited to the conditions."
The RNLI also released dramatic footage of a rescue in the Channel, when around a dozen distressed and shivering people on board a small dinghy were pulled to safety, in an effort to highlight the plight of those trying to make the trip.
Dowie commented: "This story needs to be told. It's a very polarising issue. The humanitarian side of this has not really been told properly.
"We wanted to tell this now, our crews are becoming busier and busier with this work.
"It's important that what they see and what they do is properly appreciated."
More than 9000 people have crossed the Channel so far this year on board small boats despite the Home Office vowing to make the route “unviable”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel