CITIZENS Advice Scotland (Cas) is calling for the abolition of the five-week wait and the introduction of a non-repayable assessment period grant for everyone claiming Universal Credit to stop people being swept into serious debt.
The recommendations come in a new report from the charity, including a first of its kind survey of Citizens Advice Bureau (Cab) clients who had sought Universal Credit advice.
While some elements of Universal Credit’s design such as its conditionality and its ID verification requirements were “switched off” during the pandemic, other aspects remained in force. The most significant for people claiming Universal Credit was found to be the five-week wait for the first payment, with this being repeatedly singled out by survey respondents as causing stress and anxiety:
- Almost half (48%) said they had to borrow or take an advance to get through the five-week wait.
- Among those that borrowed to get them through the five-week waiting period until they got their first payment, the majority (65%) said they will find it difficult to repay the loan.
- Single people, homeless people, and people without a final wage were more likely to require loans during the five-week wait, saddling them with debt before their UC payments have even begun.
- Single-parent families were also more likely to borrow during the five-week wait, meaning children in those families may face significant financial hardship before the first payment.
Cas social justice spokesperson Nina Ballantyne said: “Cas has long campaigned to end the five-week wait for the first payment, and today’s research shows the considerable detriment it continued to cause people throughout the pandemic.
“The five-week wait punishes the most vulnerable; those without savings and without family or friends to borrow from and those who are paid weekly who don’t have a final monthly salary payment to rely on. Many are also reluctant to take on additional debt.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here