DAVID Cameron met with the UK’s vaccine minister less than two months before a private health firm that he advises, Illumina, won £870,000-worth of public contracts, according to a new report.
Open Democracy revealed the meeting between Cameron and Nadhim Zahawi, with Illumina represented too.
It is listed in official government transparency records as being on March 1 this year “to discuss UK genomics sequencing”.
Cameron has previously claimed that his role at the company is simply to promote the benefits of genome sequencing, and that he does not lobby the government for contracts on Illumina’s behalf.
But on April 29, just two months after the initial meeting, Illumina Cambridge Ltd was awarded a £697,788 Public Health England contract to supply medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, personal care products and laboratory, optical and precision equipments. A week later on May 7, a second PHE contract worth between £34,564 and £172,824 was awarded to the company for a similar range of supplies.
READ MORE: Why history is unlikely to look kindly upon David Cameron
Rose Whiffen, research officer at Transparency International UK, said: “It will make troubling reading for many that a former prime minister can meet with his past colleagues in government on behalf of a paying client, yet there are no enforceable rules to prevent this from happening.”
Whiffen added: “Given what we know now about his lobbying for Greensill, the appearance of David Cameron elsewhere in official transparency disclosures suggests that was not an isolated attempt by him to exert influence in Whitehall after leaving office.”
But a spokesman for the former PM said the meeting was “in no way connected to government contracts”.
During his time as prime minister, Cameron set up Genomics England. A £78 million deal between Genomics England and Illumina was later announced.
Cameron was signed up as an adviser to Illumina in 2018. When he was given the role, he said he “would not play any role in contract negotiations between Genomics England (or DH) and Illumina”.
READ MORE: Backlash as property donors provide one-quarter of funds given to Tory party
It comes after Cameron acknowledged mis-steps over the Greensill Capital lobbying controversy.
He said that having “reflected on this at length” he accepts there are “important lessons to be learnt”.
The scandal surfaced when it emerged the Conservative privately lobbied ministers, including with texts to Chancellor Rishi Sunak, to win access to an emergency coronavirus loan scheme for his employer, the scandal-hit financier Lex Greensill.
The total number of ministers to be entangled in the controversy reached four when it was reported that Cameron arranged a “private drink” between Health Secretary Matt Hancock and Greensill to discuss a payment scheme later rolled out in the NHS.
Cameron also emailed a senior Downing Street adviser pressing for a rethink on Greensill’s application for access to emergency funding.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel