TODAY’S report on the search for Labour election candidates to fill a “talent gap” is further indication if any was needed that we are a very long way off seeing a Labour government in London, no matter how low Johnson’s popularity sinks.
The remnants of Labour Party members and supporters in Scotland have to realise that they can no longer bolster the party in the south. After his landslide win, Blair needed to fill his cabinet with experienced parliamentarians from Scotland; he needed their talent more than he needed their seats. That situation will not happen now and Labour will not win a General Election without winning in England. Votes for Labour in Scotland will not bring a Labour government to power in London.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour joins Keir Starmer bid to address party's 'talent deficit'
Labour in Scotland must now decide where their loyalty lies. Is their loyalty to a struggling party in the south that is trying to win by emulating the Tory party or should it be to Scotland and the chance of building a better future for all, not just the libertarians that have a chokehold on politics in England?
I look forward to seeing the Labour Party in Scotland joining the Scottish independence movement.
Ni Holmes
St Andrews
I READ with interest Fiona Matheson’s long letter (August 8). It makes an eloquent case for “do nothing”, indeed she believes that the current arrangements whereby the Regional Inshore Fisheries Groups, there are several covering all the coastal areas of Scotland, manages things just fine.
While respecting her view, so well expressed, her postulation denies the facts. These groups are ineffective, they are largely the fox looking after the chickens, being the very same fishermen causing the illegal trawling in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), “policing” themselves. Non-trawling interests like creel men are largely ignored as are other sustainable options like hand diving.
READ MORE: Fisheries policy should be guided by the existing bodies, not back-door lobbying
These regional groups are fishermen – meaning trawlers – for the trawlers. I come from a long line, excuse the pun, of fishermen. Many generations.
I am long retired but I do recall after the UK Government withdrew the existing, for the best part of 100 years, “no trawl three-mile limit” around the entire coast, members of my family made a killing, in monetary and species terms, over the next three years before we had totally wiped out and destroyed most of the inshore spawning and nursery grounds.
It was ecological vandalism on an epic scale. We all agree, looking backwards, that it was the worst thing possible. Why then did we do it? We all thought: “If I don’t trawl it the other boats will, so why not?” That’s the mindset. It is up to the Government to legislate and police the coastal environment.
Open Seas and the Greens have my full support. It’s time not only to properly protect the MPAs but also bring back the no trawl three-mile limit around the entire coast.
Longer term, it is in the best interests of the fishermen.
John Scobie
Edinburgh
A COUPLE of points in response to the letter in the Sunday National (Fisheries policy should be guided by the existing bodies, not back-door lobbying) referring to a campaign to promote the reinstatement of the three-mile limit, abandoned by a Tory government, which would ban bottom-trawling around Scotland’s coasts.
The letter mentions Open Seas, but my understanding is that the campaign for a petition was by the umbrella body, Our Seas, of which Open Seas is a supporting organisation.
I do not believe that a campaign asking for those with concerns about the health of our seas to contact their local MSPs can justifiably be described as back-door lobbying.
In contrast, an excellent example of the latter would be meetings (25 over four years) between sectoral organisations (such as fish farming) with the former Cabinet secretary, where no minutes of the discussions took place.
My main response is by question – how can any fishery management organisation, which permits bottom dredging, be taken seriously in terms of protecting the marine environment and promoting sustainable fishing?
I agree that the issues of second homes, and affordable housing, are crucial to the wellbeing of local communities.
These issues which have been around for decades are coming to a head now; glacial progress is being made to tackle them.
How are communities to be expected to thrive when young people cannot get local affordable accommodation?
You don’t have to live in such places to understand the problem. The answer is not by fiddling with the planning system – that’s been tried and failed. Land reform and controlling a housing market, which is patently failing, is the answer, which the Government is endlessly circling around.
Roddie Macpherson
Avoch
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel