'SADISTIC” monks repeatedly abused children at two schools linked to a religious order, the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry has ruled.
Inquiry chair Lady Smith has published her fifth case study finding, looking at two boarding schools run by the Benedictine monks of Fort Augustus Abbey between 1948 and 1991.
She found that children in their care suffered sexual, physical and emotional abuse, noting that some monks were “serial sexual predators” who targeted children at both schools.
This phase of the inquiry looked at the Carlekemp Priory School in North Berwick, East Lothian, and Fort Augustus Abbey School in Inverness-shire.
The inquiry heard evidence from 43 witnesses in relation to the two Benedictine schools.
Lady Smith said: “Children were sexually abused at both schools.
“A number of monks were serial sexual predators and, because of the movement of monks between Fort Augustus and Carlekemp, they were able to target victims at both schools.
“Children were cruelly beaten by sadistic monks at both schools, and some beatings had sexual overtones. Children were humiliated and punished inappropriately and excessively.
“Some children complained to monks in positions of responsibility about being abused. They received either non‑existent or inadequate responses.
“Knowing that they would not be believed, other children refrained from complaining about abuse.
“Complaints made to devout Catholic parents were rejected because they would not accept it was possible that Catholic monks would abuse children.
“The emotional scars caused by the trauma associated with sexual abuse, physical violence, and the denigration of children, were, for some, long‑lasting and debilitating, blighting their adult lives.”
The inquiry will take the findings relating to the Benedictines into account when it publishes its final report.
Those who wish to give evidence to the inquiry about the Benedictines are still able to do so.
Lady Smith added: “The monks were not trained to look after children on a residential basis.
“They lacked the capacity and ability to do so.
“The notion that untrained monks could care for school‑aged children was seriously flawed.”
During an evidence session in July 2019, a male witness told the inquiry the religious order was effectively playing “pass the paedophile” – moving one of the worst abusers around to cover up his actions.
Another witness described another monk as a “sadist” who took pleasure in beating boys with a bamboo stick.
A representative for the English Benedictine Congregation later told the inquiry the religious order offered an “unreserved apology” to everyone affected by the abuse.
The congregation said it accepted that children had been “robbed” of their childhoods and the schools had caused lasting damage.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here