THE significant discrepancies in BBC News’s reporting on politicians’ potential breaches of the ministerial code have been revealed by new analysis from The National.
A breakdown of 143 stories mentioning the ministerial code and published on the national broadcaster’s news website in 2021 reveal that 83 articles mention the First Minister’s potential breaches, for which she has now been cleared, far exceeding any other UK politician.
In fact, BBC News reported on Nicola Sturgeon’s now discredited “breaches” of the ministerial code more than it did for all the other politicians in the UK put together.
The closest in terms of article space was Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The Tory boss had just 21 pieces referencing his potential breaches of the code.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's government 'breaks ministerial code' over ministers' earnings
Next were former health secretary Matt Hancock and current Home Secretary Priti Patel, who are each mentioned as possibly breaching the ministerial code in seven stories.
Tory Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s potential breaches are mentioned in three stories, as were those of Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury Kemi Badenoch.
Jeane Freeman, the former Scottish health secretary, is mentioned in connection to a possible breach of the ministerial code once.
Freeman’s inclusion means that 84 (58%) of the 143 stories mentioning potential breaches of the ministerial code on the BBC News website were about the Scottish Government.
In contrast, just three (2%) were about Wales, and seven (5%) about the Northern Ireland executive.
The remainder were about Tory politicians or the ministerial code’s use in Westminster in general.
Of the 143 stories analysed, 17 were from the BBC’s daily round-up of newspaper front pages. A total of 13 of them were from the Scottish papers round-up and four from the UK-wide paper round-up.
Even removing these round-ups from the figures, Nicola Sturgeon remains far and away the BBC’s most scrutinised figure in UK politics in terms of her relationship with the ministerial code.
In fact, the Scottish First Minister’s potential breaches of the code were explicitly mentioned by the BBC in more UK-wide paper round-ups than Boris Johnson’s (twice against once).
The National also looked at tweets which mention the term “ministerial code” from BBC accounts.
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon promises to release report into whether she breached ministerial code, on same day she receives it https://t.co/ZFXpPP9DEn
— BBC News (UK) (@BBCNews) March 4, 2021
The twitter account @BBCNews has mentioned the term three times this year, all in relation to the First Minister. @BBCPolitics has mentioned it four times, once about Hancock and three times about Johnson, and @BBCBreaking has mentioned it twice, once each for Sturgeon and Johnson.
The revelations will add credence to the belief of many in Scotland who saw the coverage of Nicola Sturgeon’s potential breaches of the code earlier in the year that UK ministers are not given the same level of scrutiny by the media.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon did not breach ministerial code, James Hamilton finds
After Nicola Sturgeon gave evidence to the so-called “Alex Salmond inquiry”, the SNP saw its membership spike by thousands, with many citing the First Minister’s treatment by the media as a reason for signing up.
Elsewhere, recent analysis from The National of the BBC’s broadcasting output showed that the UK Government is given a much easier ride in the evening news shows than its Scottish counterpart.
The research found that between August 2 and August 6 just 9% of the political stories on the News at Six was negative towards the Tory government, while 40% of those on Reporting Scotland were negative towards the SNP’s.
A BBC spokesperson said: "The BBC takes our responsibility to hold those in power to account very seriously. We routinely scrutinise statements and stories made by politicians from all parties, across all platforms, with impartial reporting. This is reflected in all our coverage."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel