THE main developer behind the controversial Cambo oil field north-west of Shetland is ultimately owned in an offshore tax haven, which an expert claims could deprive the UK of tens of millions of pounds.
The Ferret can reveal that Siccar Point Energy, which has a controlling 70% stake in the proposed Cambo development, is owned by an “ultimate parent” company registered in Luxembourg.
Luxembourg is ranked sixth worst in the world for both tax avoidance and financial secrecy by the campaign group Tax Justice Network. There is no suggestion that Siccar’s use of the tax haven is illegal.
But environmentalists argued that Siccar’s Luxembourg ownership “destroys any claims that Cambo is important for the economy” and branded the company as “greedy”. Opposition politicians attacked “tax-avoiding profiteers” and demanded that Cambo be cancelled.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson has to display some mettle and cancel Cambo oil field plans
Siccar Point Energy stressed that it was a UK company with assets entirely based in the UK, and was hence “subject to full UK taxation”. The company has abided by “relevant tax law”, engaged in “efficient tax planning” but not in “artificial or aggressive tax arrangements”, it stated.
In recent weeks, arguments over Cambo have risen to the top of the political agenda in Scotland and the UK. Campaigners believe that agreeing to extract more oil at the site will undermine the UK’s credibility on climate change in the run-up to the COP26 international summit in Glasgow in November.
The Cambo oilfield is located 125 kilometres north-west of Shetland and is estimated to contain around 800 million barrels of crude oil. According to environmentalists, if extracted and burnt, this would cause 10 times more climate emissions than Scotland as a whole does annually.
The UK’s Government’s Oil and Gas Authority is due to make a decision by the end of 2021 on whether to give the go-ahead for production. If approved, the first oil could be extracted in 2025, with the initial phase of production expected to continue for 25 years.
According to Siccar’s 2020 annual report, the “immediate parent undertaking” is Siccar Point Finance Limited, which is incorporated in the UK. But the report’s last line added: “The company’s ultimate parent undertaking is Siccar Point Luxembourg SCA, a company registered in Luxembourg.”
The Tax Justice Network has calculated that by acting as a tax haven, Luxembourg deprives other countries of £20 billion a year in tax revenues. That’s the equivalent of the annual salaries of more than two million nurses.
Private finance think tank the European Services Strategy Unit estimated that Siccar could save “tens of millions of pounds” in tax by being based in Luxembourg. The “financial flows” will be through Luxembourg instead of the UK, said the unit’s Dexter Whitfield.
He added: “The presence of the parent company in a tax haven means that the flow of profits, interest payments, supply chain contracts and even some labour contracts will be channelled via Luxembourg resulting in a loss of UK taxation revenue. This will make local contracts and jobs more difficult to obtain.”
“This is significantly different from having a parent company in Scotland and subsidiary in Luxembourg. This situation will mean increased secrecy and commercial confidentiality resulting in further erosion of democratic accountability.”
Friends of the Earth Scotland (FoES) warned that Siccar’s tax haven ownership “further destroys any claims that Cambo is important for the economy”. The climate couldn’t afford the “devastating” pollution it would produce, said the environmental group’s campaigner Caroline Rance.
“The UK Government already has one of the weakest tax regimes for oil and gas but these greedy companies just can’t help themselves by going after more profits at the public expense,” she told The Ferret.
“The scandalous reality is that these tax-dodging companies already receive millions of pounds of public money in subsidies that encourage their climate-wrecking activities while failing to pay their fair share of tax.”
SICCAR reported profits of £117 million ($161m) in 2018, £29m ($40m) in 2019 and a loss of £76m ($106m) in 2020 because of a collapse in oil prices. In 2019, it said that Cambo “will help drive the long-term growth of the company and is to the benefit of all the company’s stakeholders”.
The company bought Cambo in 2017, and in 2018 sold a 30% stake to the Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell. Siccar expects a total of about £1.9bn to be invested into Cambo, with £140m already sunk into the project.
Shell has also come under fire for its tax arrangements in the past. In December 2020, Reuters reported that in 2018 and 2019 the company earned more than £1.96bn ($2.7bn) tax-free by reporting profits in companies located in Bermuda and the Bahamas.
Reuters estimated that if Shell had put these profits through its headquarters in the Netherlands, the company could have faced a £507m ($700m) tax bill based on the country’s 25% corporate tax rate.
CNN reported that Shell would usually expect a 20% to 25% return on investments such as Cambo. This suggested that the development could yield between £380m and £475m in profit by 2050.
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie MSP was not surprised that the UK’s “reckless expansion of fossil fuel production is being conducted by tax-avoiding profiteers. This is exactly why building a greener Scotland isn’t just about getting control of energy policy, it is about creating a different kind of economy, one that doesn’t allow the super-rich to hoard vast amounts of wealth offshore at the expense of everyone else.”
Scottish Labour’s finance spokesperson, Paul Sweeney MSP, said The Ferret’s revelation served as “a reminder that leaving the fight on climate change to market forces is a strategy that is doomed to fail”.
If it goes ahead, Cambo would be the first major new fossil fuel project in the UK since the International Energy Agency warned in May that no new oil, coal or natural gas projects should proceed if the world is to meet its target of net-zero climate emissions by 2050.
A decision on the project will also come in the wake of the sixth report on climate science published by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on August 6. It warned of a “code red for humanity”.
As hosts of the UN’s flagship COP26 climate conference in November, both the UK and Scottish governments have come under intense pressure to block the Cambo development.
The COP26 summit is widely cited as the world’s last chance to reach an agreement which could minimise the worst impacts of the climate emergency.
Greenpeace has threatened legal action if the UK Government approves a permit for Cambo. Friends of the Earth has submitted a petition with 80,000 signatures to Downing Street demanding that Prime Minister Boris Johnson rejects the proposal.
Johnson has told reporters that Westminster “can’t just tear up contracts”, presumably referring to the initial exploration licence granted for Cambo in 2001. But critics pointed out that a licence to actually start extracting oil has not yet been agreed.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon wrote to Johnson on August 12 asking for the UK Government to “reassess” licences for new oil and gas projects “where field development has not yet commenced”, including Cambo.
She also called on the UK Government to significantly enhance the “climate conditionality” associated with future oil and gas production. Despite this, Sturgeon has come under renewed attack from environmental groups and opposition politicians for failing to take a clear public stance against Cambo.
Siccar Point Energy stressed that it paid tax in the UK.
A company spokesperson told The Ferret: “Siccar Point Energy is a UK company with assets entirely based in the UK. As such it is subject to full UK taxation.
“The Cambo development will positively contribute to the UK economy by creating 1000 new direct jobs within the UK and thousands more in the supply chain also in the UK, as well as reducing the UK’s reliance on energy imports.”
According to its website, Siccar was “supporting the UK’s energy transition through sustainable UK production”. An online statement described the company’s tax policy as “principled, transparent and sustainable”.
It added: “We adhere to relevant tax law and our priority is timely and full compliance. We engage in efficient tax planning that supports our business and reflects commercial and economic activity. We do not engage in artificial or aggressive tax arrangements.”
SICCAR is based in Aberdeen, and has a registered office in Leeds. In 2020, it employed 38 people and had interests in eight major North Sea oil fields, in addition to Cambo.
The firm is named after the Siccar Point geological formation on the east coast of Scotland, where Scottish geologist James Hutton found definitive evidence for his seminal theory of the Earth.
The company’s website says that Hutton’s work was inspired by “evidence-based and contrarian thinking” which the company views as “no better inspiration for an exploration and production company seeking to find value beneath the waves of the North Sea”.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross labelled 'petulant troll' over Nicola Sturgeon oil letter
Shell said it was “committed to tax compliance” in all “countries and locations where we have a taxable presence”.
A company spokesperson said: “Where Shell entities operate in low-tax jurisdictions, they are there for commercial and substantive reasons, and these entities benefit from the local tax regime.
“We are committed to complying with the applicable tax legislation of all the countries in which we operate. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development principle is that profit should be taxed in the countries where the economic activities take place.”
The Cambo development has been backed by Oil and Gas UK, the trade association for the offshore industry. It was “part of a low-carbon journey that will support energy security, jobs, the economy and the net-zero future that everyone wants to see,” said chief executive Deirdre Michie.
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at www.theferret. scot and can subscribe for £3 a month here: www.theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel