FOREIGN Secretary Dominic Raab has admitted the UK Government did not see the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan coming, adding it will have to engage with them in the future in order to hold them to account for their actions.
Dominic Raab said several nations were “caught off-guard” by the quick and hostile nature of the militant group’s takeover, which has prompted Afghans to flee the country.
He added that intelligence services had been tracking what was happening on the ground in Afghanistan “very carefully” after the US decided to reduce its troops in the country.
The military is still carrying out evacuations flights to Afghanistan
Raab said: “The truth is, across the world, people were caught by surprise. I haven’t spoken to an international interlocutor, including countries in the region over the last week, who hasn’t been surprised.
READ MORE: Michael Fry: Why UK and west must now stay out of Afghanistan
“We saw a very swift change in the dynamics, and of course this has been part and parcel of the withdrawal of Western troops, but it has also been the way and the approach of the Taliban.
“Of course it’s been a test for the Afghan security forces. All of those factors have been very fluid. But no one saw this coming. Of course we would have taken action if we had.”
He defended his decision to return from his holiday when he did, adding he arrived back in the UK “as soon as the situation deteriorated and demanded it”.
In another interview, Raab said the UK Government believed the Taliban would attempt to move in the autumn and in a more gradual manner.
READ MORE: GB News: Nigel Farage condemned for ‘divisive’ rhetoric on Afghanistan refugees
Asked if he would sit down with his counterpart in a Taliban government, the Foreign Secretary said it would not happen “for the foreseeable future” but added there has always been some form of communication between the UK and the militant group.
He said: “We’ve always had dialogue of some sort, either indirectly through third parties, or through the Taliban’s political commission in Doha.
“It is important to be able to engage at least in some shape or form to test and to exert as much influence as we credibly, realistically can, and also to try and hold the Taliban to account to the new commitments they made.”
READ MORE: Afghanistan: Boris Johnson went on holiday despite warnings Kabul about to fall
Labour's shadow minister for Asia and the Pacific Stephen Kinnock said the approach of withdrawing troops from Afghanistan has been “catastrophically mishandled”, noting the “shambolic scenes” from Kabul airport on Monday, which saw people clinging to aeroplanes as they attempted to take off.
“This is an utter failure of the execution of the strategy and the Prime Minister has really serious questions to answer,” he said.
“It seems to me it’s absolutely extraordinary that they didn’t have this scenario in mind. There seem to be a kind of hyper-optimistic scenario whereby the Afghan army would resist the march of the Taliban, and that clearly has not happened.”
Around 900 armed forces are in Afghanistan helping to bring UK nationals home and secure the safety of selected Afghans.
Raab said 150 British nationals were flown out on Sunday while 289 Afghan nationals were taken out last week.
A further 350 British and Afghans will be taken out of the country in the next 24 hours.
The Prime Minister is expected to announce a “bespoke” resettlement scheme to allow fleeing Afghans to set-up home in the UK shortly.
The Telegraph reported the concept could be similar to that used to take in Syrian refugees in 2015, which saw women with children, people with serious medical conditions and survivors of torture prioritised.
Raab said he was unable to confirm how many refugees would be coming to the UK from Afghanistan but added it was “right” to consider a bespoke process for Afghan nationals.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel