NICOLA Sturgeon has criticised the UK Government for failing to do enough to help Afghan refugees fleeing the Taliban takeover of the country.
The UK Government has announced plans to resettle 20,000 vulnerable Afghans – particularly women and girls – with 5000 arriving in the first 12 months.
Nicola Sturgeon said more needs to be done to help and Scotland stands ready to play its part.
LIVE: MPs debate Afghanistan crisis as Westminster is recalled
The SNP leader said: “I don’t think the UK Government is doing enough or stepping up and meeting its responsibilities.
“Twenty-thousand [refugees] over what they’re describing as the long term – I don’t know exactly what they mean by that – doesn’t even live up to the Syrian resettlement programme.
“I think the commitment is only for 5000 in this first year.
“What’s unfolded in Afghanistan over the past days and weeks is horrifying and it has been contributed to because of the abrupt, unmanaged withdrawal of troops.
“I think countries across the world have a real obligation – for humanitarian and human rights reasons – not to simply abandon the people of Afghanistan, women and girls in particular, to the mercies of the Taliban and to whatever fate has in store for them.
WATCH: Alyn Smith blames UK Government over Afghan refugees
“Instead, we must show [willingness] to provide help, support and refuge, so I would call on the UK Government to build on its announcement today, for them to do more, and I will repeat the commitment that – just as we did in the Syrian resettlement programme – the Scottish Government stands ready to play our full part in helping meet that obligation.”
While the announcement of a UK resettlement scheme for Afghan refugees is welcome in principle, the commitment to 20,000 in ‘long term’ and just 5000 this year is woefully inadequate. I call on UK Gov to go further to meet its responsibilities. @scotgov ready to play full part
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) August 18, 2021
She said the Scottish Government is considering using its Humanitarian Emergency Fund to provide aid for Afghans.
MPs returned from recess for an emergency sitting of Parliament today to debate the situation in Afghanistan.
READ MORE: Afghanistan debate: SNP MPs correct Tory's 'nonsense' claim about refugee resettlement
Prime Minister Boris Johnson told the Commons it is an “illusion” to believe the UK alone could have prevented the collapse of Afghanistan after US troops withdrew.
“I think it would be fair to say that the events in Afghanistan have unfolded and the collapse has been faster than even the Taliban themselves predicted,” he said.
“What is not true is to say the UK Government was unprepared or did not foresee this.
“It was certainly part of our planning – the very difficult logistical operation for the withdrawal of UK nationals has been under preparation for many months.”
He said the priority was to evacuate as many of the remaining UK nationals and Afghans who had worked with the British in the country as quickly as possible.
READ MORE: 'You're trying to wind me up': Ian Blackford in Commons clash with Dominic Raab
Speaking in the Commons debate, the SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford (above) repeated calls for a future “judge-led inquiry” into the war in Afghanistan, saying it is needed to ensure “such a massive foreign policy failure is never again repeated”.
He also again called for a summit of the four UK nations to house those fleeing Afghanistan and said the UK Government’s approach to refugees needed “fundamental change”.
The Scottish Refugee Council’s chief executive Sabir Zazai (below) said: “The UK Government’s announcement of an Afghan Citizens’ Resettlement Scheme is a welcome first step but we also need to provide immediate help to those fleeing the crisis in Afghanistan.
“The sad truth is that not everyone who needs to reach safety from Afghanistan will be able to do so through this scheme.
“The scenes at Kabul Airport are a reminder that people don’t get a choice over the way they escape.”
He called on the UK to commit to a “fair and humane asylum system”, drop plans for the Borders and Nationality Bill, give refugee status to Afghan nationals currently in the UK asylum system and commit to widening family reunion laws.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel